Both the process of elimination and reading published descriptions of Eastern Epeorus
group) seem to leave fragilis
as the only likely possibility for this specimen (as well as the related ones--#630, #631, and #633). The collection date is near the emergence range given for fragilis
, and they match the description of this species in nearly every way except one: size.
Burian, et al. (2008) provide a key for Northeastern Epeorus
adults that uses size as a significant means of distinguishing between fragilis
. They describe fragilis
as less than 6.80mm. All of these specimens are larger, ranging from about 7mm-8.5mm. This puts them squarely within the range given for (the very similar) frisoni
is described as being lighter in color than these specimens, two comments from the Burian publication are particularly interesting in this regard:
At least one of us believes that a thorough search of suitable, higher elevation, cold streams in the White Mountains of New Hampshire, the Adirondacks of New York, and the Gaspe area of Quebec should result in the discovery of several new records [of frisoni].
The habitat association of E. frisoni with cold (even in summer), high gradient, minimally disturbed streams at or above 1200' (~365m) could be used to identify some of the best high elevation lotic habitats for conservation purposes. Variation among the New England subset of the eastern Nearctic genus Epeorus strongly points to the need for a full revision of this genus.
It would probably be reasonable to place these specimens as (size-anomalous) fragilis
under the current taxonomic scheme. However, the stream in which they were captured seems to fit the above criteria pretty well. It would be very interesting to see someone like Konchu investigate this population further.