Troutnut.com Fly Fishing for Trout Home
User Password
or register.
Scientific name search:

> > Probably E. fragilis, but...



The Specimen

Epeorus frisoni Mayfly DunEpeorus frisoni Mayfly Dun View 7 PicturesI collected this female dun together with a female spinner, a male dun, and a larger, damaged male dun.
Collected September 6, 2006 from Mystery Creek #23 in New York
Added to Troutnut.com by on October 3, 2006

The Discussion

Post Reply
GONZOApril 8th, 2009, 3:07 pm
Site Editor
"Bear Swamp," PA

Posts: 1681		Both the process of elimination and reading published descriptions of Eastern Epeorus (pleuralis group) seem to leave fragilis as the only likely possibility for this specimen (as well as the related ones--#630, #631, and #633). The collection date is near the emergence range given for fragilis, and they match the description of this species in nearly every way except one: size.

Burian, et al. (2008) provide a key for Northeastern Epeorus adults that uses size as a significant means of distinguishing between fragilis and frisoni. They describe fragilis as less than 6.80mm. All of these specimens are larger, ranging from about 7mm-8.5mm. This puts them squarely within the range given for (the very similar) frisoni--6.83mm-9.42mm.

Although frisoni is described as being lighter in color than these specimens, two comments from the Burian publication are particularly interesting in this regard:

At least one of us believes that a thorough search of suitable, higher elevation, cold streams in the White Mountains of New Hampshire, the Adirondacks of New York, and the Gaspe area of Quebec should result in the discovery of several new records [of frisoni].


The habitat association of E. frisoni with cold (even in summer), high gradient, minimally disturbed streams at or above 1200' (~365m) could be used to identify some of the best high elevation lotic habitats for conservation purposes. Variation among the New England subset of the eastern Nearctic genus Epeorus strongly points to the need for a full revision of this genus.


It would probably be reasonable to place these specimens as (size-anomalous) fragilis under the current taxonomic scheme. However, the stream in which they were captured seems to fit the above criteria pretty well. It would be very interesting to see someone like Konchu investigate this population further.

TroutnutApril 8th, 2009, 8:53 pm
Administrator
Bellevue, WA

Posts: 2737		Sounds like a good fit. The size difference leaves a pretty big question mark over this ID, but for a relatively obscure species it's quite possible the full size range isn't fully documented. In such an isolated system high in the Catskills.

I can't tell the general audience where exactly these flies are from, but it's a small stream high in the Catskills that matches the description Gonzo found pretty well.
Jason Neuswanger, Ph.D.
Troutnut and salmonid ecologist

Quick Reply

You have to be logged in to post on the forum. It's this easy:
Username:          Email:

Password:    Confirm Password:

I am at least 13 years old and agree to the rules.

Related Discussions

TitleRepliesLast Reply
Re: Thoughts on this Heptageniid's ID?
In Male Epeorus vitreus Mayfly Dun by Troutnut		1Oct 28, 2008
by GONZO
Re: A mystery late-season Epeorus
In Male Epeorus frisoni Mayfly Dun by Troutnut		7May 9, 2012
by Entoman
ID on this one?
In Male Epeorus Mayfly Dun by Troutnut		0
Re: Epeorus
In the Identify This! Board by Crepuscular		33Apr 19, 2012
by Crepuscular
Re: Briefly exploring steelhead streams
In Site Updates by Troutnut		4Jan 26, 2021
by Pdcox
Re: Fly Fishing Southwest Idaho - Trout Lakes/Streams
In General Discussion by Dry4Flies		2Jul 26, 2013
by Sayfu
Distance between the eyes of male Epeorus
In the Mayfly Genus Epeorus by Troutnut		0
Re: Night Time is the Right Time
In the Photography Board by Crepuscular		8Sep 17, 2013
by Entoman
Re: Salmonfly question for you westerners
In the Stonefly Species Pteronarcys californica by Troutnut		7Jun 4, 2016
by Chipper
37 New Specimens Today
In General Discussion by Troutnut		0