Blog & Latest Updates
Fly Fishing Articles
Insects by Common Name
> > Tailing
View Full Size (2.4X larger)
| Wbranch | January 29th, 2015, 6:21 pm | |
 Posts: 2733 | Here is a green drake tied with moose mane and some March Brown variants tied with microfibbets. | |
| Catskill fly fisher for fifty-five years. | ||
| Feathers5 | January 30th, 2015, 9:38 am | |
| Posts: 287 | Those are nice. Did Dr. Tony show you how to tie those? | |
| Kschaefer3 | January 30th, 2015, 10:07 am | |
 Posts: 376 | Thanks for posting these, Matt! I really like the look of the moose mane for larger flies. I'll need to consider that for any bigger mayfly patterns I tie up. It is hard to go wrong with the microfibbets as well. They are easy to work with and durable in my limited experience. | |
| Wbranch | January 30th, 2015, 11:24 am | |
Posts: 2733 | Feathers5, "Did Dr. Tony show you how to tie those?" Is that a joke? Dr. Tony ties a very nice fly but I was tying flies before he was born. The truth be told Dr. Tony knows how to tie Hackle Stackers and I've yet to learn how to tie them, | |
| Catskill fly fisher for fifty-five years. | ||
| Lastchance | January 31st, 2015, 11:44 am | |
| Portage, PA Posts: 437 | Feathers5, Just playing with you. Dr. Tony speaks highly of your expertise. | |
| Kschaefer3 | February 2nd, 2015, 10:23 am | |
Posts: 376 | The truth be told Dr. Tony knows how to tie Hackle Stackers and I've yet to learn how to tie them, I really want to learn the hackle stacker as well. I know a few who do well fishing them in small sizes over midges. | |
| Kschaefer3 | February 2nd, 2015, 3:05 pm | |
Posts: 376 | To dub or not to dub? I am looking for any and all opinions on dubbing underneath the hackle on fully hackled patterns. As I understand it, traditionally they are not, but looking for personal preferences. I know the visi-dun, for instance, is dubbed underneath. I am hosting a few friends for a tying night tomorrow. P. adoptiva and E. needhami are on the docket, both emergers and duns. | |
| Roguerat | February 2nd, 2015, 3:32 pm | |
 | Would Thorax and Hair Wing Dun patterns be considered fully hackled with a dubbed under-body? Both styles get the bottom-side hackle clipped to make them low-riding in the surface film, but I do wind their hackle over a dubbed thorax per tying instructions. Still wondering if a Blue Quill and a Little Mahogany are the same critter...same for E needhami, Apple Green Sulphur or Little Dark Hendrickson? | |
| Wbranch | February 2nd, 2015, 3:33 pm | |
Posts: 2733 | Well I'm not an expert on tying flies but I think originally the Catskill style of flies did not have a dubbing built up thorax. Once the abdomen was dubbed it was stopped about 2/3 up from the bend of the hook. Then the hackle(s) where palmered to about 1/32" - 1/16" away from the eye. I don't know if dubbing under the hackle catches more trout but I do like how it looks as it makes the thorax area more robust and it adds to the floatation of the fly if the dubbing is water resistant. | |
| Catskill fly fisher for fifty-five years. | ||
| Kschaefer3 | February 2nd, 2015, 3:42 pm | |
Posts: 376 | Rogue - That's the type of info I was looking for. For my question, let's consider them fully hackled. Thanks for the reply! Also, I believe that Blue Quill and Little Mahogany are the same, at least per Jason's wonderful encyclopedia (the value of which I am quickly learning). Matt - Thanks! I was wondering whether flotation might be a factor. I also wonder if the trout can pick out the abdomen in all the hackle. If so, dubbing the thorax might make it slightly more realistic. | |
| Wbranch | February 2nd, 2015, 4:12 pm | |
Posts: 2733 | Kyle,I also wonder if the trout can pick out the abdomen in all the hackle. Well I don't wrap my hackle as close together on a dubbed thorax fly as I would on a variant or typical Catskill fly. It would make little sense to dub the thorax and then wrap hackle so closely that you, or the fish, can't see it. | |
| Catskill fly fisher for fifty-five years. | ||
| Oldredbarn | February 3rd, 2015, 5:45 pm | |
 Posts: 2608 | It would make little sense to dub the thorax and then wrap hackle so closely that you, or the fish, can't see it. :) Kyle. It's funny to me that you are tying dries and I tied some fur strip Clousers the other night for a small mouth bass outing in May?! :) Spence | |
| "Even when my best efforts fail it's a satisfying challenge, and that, after all, is the essence of fly fishing." -Chauncy Lively "Envy not the man who lives beside the river, but the man the river flows through." Joseph T Heywood | ||
| Kschaefer3 | February 4th, 2015, 9:57 am | |
Posts: 376 | It would make little sense to dub the thorax and then wrap hackle so closely that you, or the fish, can't see it. The tables have turned :). I have been having way too much fun tying dries lately to think about streamers. Plus, my streamer box is plenty full. I always liked fishing dries, but maybe didn't understand the obsession. I think I'm starting to get it now... | |
| Entoman | February 4th, 2015, 11:53 am | |
 Posts: 2604 | Kyle,It would make little sense to dub the thorax and then wrap hackle so closely that you, or the fish, can't see it. Actually, it's a pretty good idea in some cases. First, if you ever clip the underside hackle when in need of a flush floating fly, you'll be glad that dubbing is there. Even if you don't, the dubbing will influence the color and add a little bulk for the thicker thorax that many mayflies have, especially the ephemerellids. Not all the fibers will be trapped, no matter how dense the hackle. Tie them up both ways with the same turns of hackle and you will notice the difference quite easily. The practice also allows for sparser hackle if need be. I know some anglers that don't bother with spinner patterns for PMD's. They claim to run into them so "infrequently";) that they just clip the bottom hackle and the wings out of a Red Quill they have on hand for other hatches. A K Best is perhaps more responsible than anyone for reviving interest in traditionally collared mayfly patterns. He advises starting hackle with a little bit of the web retained to simulate thoracic bulk. He has also innovated in many other ways. His selection of materials, proportions and tying methods are quite unique and always purposeful. While many would consider his methods heretical and frankly a bet messy looking, I must admit they're damned effective. Once you get his techniques down it is by far the easiest and fastest way to tie a dry fly. The way he applies wings is brilliant. You may want to check him out. | |
| "It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman | ||
| Kschaefer3 | February 4th, 2015, 12:00 pm | |
Posts: 376 | Kurt - I appreciate the info/advice and will check out A K Best.Actually, it's a pretty good idea in some cases. First, if you ever clip the underside hackle when in need of a flush floating fly, you'll be glad that dubbing is there. Like this?  Not the greatest, but it was my first attempt at a "thorax dun". I doubt I tied it to the specs of the actual pattern, and didn't criss cross my hackle (didn't want that spread out, messy look), but I'm happy enough to fish it. | |
| Entoman | February 4th, 2015, 12:08 pm | |
Posts: 2604 | Yes, but I'd only do it streamside if needed. The thorax fly also makes a decent full hackled fly for the riffles. You can always cut 'em out but you can't put 'em back...:) | |
| "It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman | ||
| Kschaefer3 | February 4th, 2015, 12:12 pm | |
Posts: 376 | That one is for the spring creeks I fish, so I went ahead and clipped them straight away. I am usually fishing risers over flat, slow water and like low riding patterns. I fish some freestones north of me though, and will consider tying them fully hackled and only clipping if need be. I like the idea of stream side modifications. | |
| Wbranch | February 4th, 2015, 12:46 pm | |
Posts: 2733 | Kurt,It would make little sense to dub the thorax and then wrap hackle so closely that you, or the fish, can't see it. My point in this comment was not meant to imply that I wouldn't dub the thorax because I do on 90% of my dry flies. What I was trying to convey to Kyle is that I don't palmer the hackle so closely together that the hackle obscures, and defeats, the reason for the dubbing. I agree strongly that the dubbed thorax adds to the floatation qualities of the fly. Both flies are TMC 100 #18. There are no more than four turns of hackle on either one. Oops! I just noticed the BWO thorax dun has a straight eye and a true Model Perfect bend so I'm thinking it is one of my Orvis "Big Eye" hooks. See how the thorax dubbing shows through clearly between the hackle wraps?   | |
| Catskill fly fisher for fifty-five years. | ||
| Entoman | February 4th, 2015, 4:18 pm | |
Posts: 2604 | Didn't know I was quoting you, Matt. Sorry if I took it out of context. That's what I get for assuming it was Kyle's comment working off of Spence's post. ;) A dense hackled fly like you typically see on western attractor dries would make the dubbing an extra step of questionable value. I would say the same for the nice Variant examples you posted. I certainly don't dub thoraxes on my Catskill flies. I only carry four - the light and dark Hendricksons and the Gordon and Red Quills. Even those are only a few tucked away and rarely used. For some reason, never did much damage with the Light Cahills or March Browns, so I don't bother with them any more. I do carry quite a few Best style for hatch matching and I prefer his method for the Adams as well. I've found a collar hackled fly often more effective on riffly water; particularly breezy lake conditions.. Not sure why... | |
| "It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman | ||
| Wbranch | February 4th, 2015, 5:12 pm | |
Posts: 2733 | Kurt,A dense hackled fly like you typically see on western attractor dries would make the dubbing an extra step of questionable value. I would say the same for the nice Variant examples you posted. I certainly don't dub thoraxes on my Catskill flies. I only carry four - the light and dark Hendricksons and the Gordon and Red Quills. Even those are only a few tucked away and rarely used. For some reason, never did much damage with the Light Cahills or March Browns, so I don't bother with them any more. I do carry quite a few Best style for hatch matching and I prefer his method for the Adams as well. I've found a collar hackled fly often more effective on riffly water; particularly breezy lake conditions.. Not sure why... Yep, I agree with you 100%. I've seen Humpy's (Goofus Bugs) and Salmon Fly dries that probably have 2-3 hackles palmered so tightly that it looks like a bottle brush. Any enhancement of the thorax prior to hackling would be a waste of time. Also agree, in part, about the March Browns. On the Delaware system the nymphs literally cover the bottoms of rocks in riffly water yet it is a rare day in deed to see an emergence where large numbers of duns are on the water at the same time, and trout are eating them. I can only remember twice, once on the upper East Branch, and once on the middle main stem, where there were good numbers of duns on the water and my #10 MB Compara-dun was deadly and I put a dozen 18" - 21" browns in the boat on each instance. Here are fish from each of those instances;   | |
| Catskill fly fisher for fifty-five years. | ||
Quick Reply
You have to be logged in to post on the forum. It's this easy:
Related Discussions
| Title | Replies | Last Reply |
| Re: Original paterns In Fly Tying by Leakyboots | 6 | Jan 15, 2017 by Jmd123 |
| Re: Midging In General Discussion by Sayfu | 4 | Mar 30, 2013 by Sayfu |
Re: Three Trouble Makers at the Midwest Fly Fishing Expo the past weekend In the Photography Board by Oldredbarn | 3 | Mar 11, 2014 by TNEAL |
| Re: Need help.. In Fly Tying by Nightangler | 1 | Sep 16, 2006 by GONZO |
| Mosquito Adams In Fly Tying by Mcflyangler | 0 | |
| Re: Dark Hendrickson wings In Fly Tying by Roguerat | 5 | May 9, 2013 by Roguerat |
| Re: Good basic materials? In Fly Tying by Dillo | 3 | Oct 22, 2015 by Roguerat |
| Re: Emergers In Fly Tying by Fishingguru | 3 | Feb 8, 2008 by Dano |
| Re: Ton's question about behavioral drift In General Discussion by Martinlf | 4 | Sep 14, 2007 by Mcjames |
| Re: Klinghamer In Fly Tying by Goose | 2 | Jan 21, 2007 by Mvbelzen |
Troutnut.com is copyright © 2004-2024 Jason
Neuswanger (email Jason). See my FAQ for information about use of my images.
privacy policy
privacy policy