Troutnut.com Fly Fishing for Trout Home
User Password
or register.
Scientific name search:

> > Clinger nymphs are shaped that way to hang in really fast currents. Really?

This topic is about the Mayfly Genus Rhithrogena

This genus is widespread across the country, but it is only of major importance to anglers in the West.

The best hatches come from Rhithrogena morrisoni, Rhithrogena hageni, and Rhithrogena undulata. Even the less common species , Rhithrogena futilis, and Rhithrogena robusta are probably more important than any of their Eastern counterparts.

The East/Midwest species are Rhithrogena jejuna, Rhithrogena manifesta, and Rhithrogena impersonata, which is arguably the most important of a minor group. All of them are widespread and none of them are abundant except in rare locations, mostly in Michigan and Wisconsin. Read more...

There are 14 more specimens...

The Discussion

EntomanFebruary 24th, 2013, 3:56 am
Site Editor
Northern CA & ID

Posts: 2604
It is commonly held that clingers are flattened to make their lives better adapted to faster water. Their teardrop shape is certainly a classic symbol of aero and hydrodynamic perfection, so there must be some connection, right? It seems to me that such ideas show a complete misunderstanding of the hydraulic reality in which they live. Current is negligable even in the fastest a few mm. from the surface of solid objects. In fact, it is actually quite calm. I've observed baetids clinging by their tippy toes to the tops of rocks in fast riffles with no apparent effort, often next to clinger species that look like they're hanging on for dear life. What if clinger nymphs are flattened not to hold their place in fast currents but rather to facilitate movement in their ecological niche of the cramped spaces under and between cobble or crevices in other substrate types?

It is also thought that the gills of some species form ''suction'' to hold them in place. Since suction is a phenomena of vacuum creation in the atmosphere, how are these nymphs accomplishing this underwater? Is it their ultra delicate gills that hold them in place or a firm claw grip? The horizontal sprawl of the legs masks this as the gills stay in place until the legs brake free. Exposed to the air, the gills seem to laminate against the rock, just as crepe paper would if first held underwater before a rock was lifted out into the air from underneath it. However, underwater their gills behave like the crepe, flowing freely. They are performing their function as gills not suction cups. I find it hard to believe they evolved the way some think merely so they can make it more difficult for humans to pluck them from rocks in the atmosphere. How is it these mighty structures that defy our attempts to pry them from the rocks curiously fall off so easily when prodded for inspection a few seconds later in a tray or jostled in a container on the way home?

Even many scientific papers have encouraged these dubious beliefs so it's not just angler myth... And they go unchallenged... Thoughts?
"It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman
TaxonFebruary 24th, 2013, 5:41 am
Site Editor
Plano, TX

Posts: 1273
Hi Kurt-

Okay, I'll bite. Heptageniid nymphs are characterized by a dorso-ventrally compressed bodies, the head of which is generally the widest body region, and with a thorax and abdomen which taper back from it. As for the (fore and aft) ventral gills, I believe that to really be an exception (as opposed to rule) for the family.

Why exactly did they evolve into this particular shape? I would suggest that the shape simply favored their survival in whatever the ecological niche they happened to occupy a veeeeeeeeeeeery long time ago.

Does their body shape continue to favor their survival in their current ecological niche, where they cling to rocks and/or squeeze into tight places? I would think so. Anyway, for better or worse, those are my thoughts on the subject, and now we are both stuck with them. :-)
Roger Rohrbeck
www.FlyfishingEntomology.com
BrookymanFebruary 24th, 2013, 12:03 pm
Banned
Posts: 797
I'll go with both of you here. Two other things in this subject that may or my not be part of it.

There is a zero velocity zone that existed not only on top of a rock the MM's Kurt stated. But a lateral vortex forms like a "sideways tornado" behind the rocks similar to a back draft. Looking close to the ventral side of the thorax the whole under carriage is concave. That would allow a lift while receiving down force form the dorsal surface that could create a zero effort area as far as physical labor. I can't help but think that these dynamics would also be a great aid in the zero velocity zone. They could use their legs to pull their body up more on the right side lets say, and then both sides together as they rise and fall like elevators on a airplane wing all the time attached to a rock. The femurs are all pointing down in the front too that could also aid in natural down force.

Also on most from the "Steno-group" the whole abdominal cavity top and bottom from a anterior view is shaped like a airplane as well. The lateral edges are flattened and positioned more ventraly. Sorta like wings. That might go to the area of why they wiggle side to side with their entire abdomenal cavity cause they sure don't swim. The flared side would sorta be a rudder in both lift and shift. :) Raising the 10th to the 7th segment would work like a sports car wing making down force to create lift in the front.

The other that interest me is the denticulated claws on just the front ??? Do they aid in the bonding process ??? And why certain species only have them. I don't know if they add value.

Mack.

Banned for threatening another user and then trying to circumvent a kinder "soft" ban with fake accounts
PaulRobertsFebruary 24th, 2013, 1:03 pm
Colorado

Posts: 1755
Roger's point that multiple selective forces (over a loooooonng time) play roles in current body configurations is a good one. Certainly clinger types are found in a variety of flow and substrate types. But your specific question has certainly been looked at.

I did read something about this a bit ago. As I understand it, the bottom line was that such inverts are not flattened to live in the viscous layer (which is very thin indeed less than 1mm at best and often measured in angstroms) but instead have body morphologies that serve life in complex flows. Here's some of it:

“A growing larva initially is subject to friction drag, but subsequently experiences mainly pressure drag. This analysis implies that animals might be expected to be more rotund when small and become more streamlined as they grow. Since this does not appear to be true, either the analysis is flawed or body shape is constrained by other agents of selection. … Although each of these laboratory studies has its limitations, collectively they undermine the idea that animals on substrate surfaces routinely find shelter from current within a viscous sublayer.”

“Many invertebrate taxa, including those with flattened shape that has long been viewed as an adaptation to dwell within the viscous sublayer, in fact experience complex flows and relatively high shear. For these organisms, size and shape are important mainly because they influence the ratio of inertial to viscous forces that the organism experiences, and not because of (any need for) sheltering from the current.”
-from “Stream Ecology” by David Allan.


-from Statzner and Holm, 1982.

This diagram shows that flow forces are directed at a certain point of the carapace, and that some turbulence is likely at peripheral, esp downstream areas. The body looks like a hydrofoil (same as an aerofoil) complete with canards to regulate turbulence.

Another use for the flattened shape that I’ve observed (many times) and never heard discussed elsewhere is that flattened species that live in strong currents (some clinger mays and stones) can swim very effectively. They appear to tuck the head using the body, and likely the legs, like a diving plane. They also use their flattened legs as paddles, rapidly fluttering them to swim. They are effective in current and can reach bottom very quickly, almost a vertical descent.
EntomanFebruary 24th, 2013, 3:35 pm
Site Editor
Northern CA & ID

Posts: 2604
Okay, I'll bite.

Thanks, Taxon. Just trying to stimulate discussion between flies. My vice isn't much of a conversationalist.:)

As for the (fore and aft) ventral gills, I believe that to really be an exception (as opposed to rule) for the family.

As regards species counts, yes. But in terms of sheer numbers of critters, none come closer than a tiny fraction to the "suction" gilled Epeorus and Rhithrogena genera in the western states. Regardless, this point begs the question.

Another use for the flattened shape that I’ve observed (many times) and never heard discussed elsewhere is that flattened species that live in strong currents (some clinger mays and stones) can swim very effectively. They appear to tuck the head using the body, and likely the legs, like a diving plane. They also use their flattened legs as paddles, rapidly fluttering them to swim. They are effective in current and can reach bottom very quickly, almost a vertical descent.

I've noticed the same ability, Paul. The quick vertical decent would be vital in reestablishing a foothold (gill hold?) quickly in the event of flood stage flows that frequently dislodge whole sections of the substrata, lose their footing while migrating to their emergence sites, or are dislodged for other reasons.

It seems to me that you have hit on what may be the second part for the real purpose of heptageniid conformation. In other words, how would nature design a body who's primary purpose is to access tight spaces in an aquatic invironment, be able to scuttle around quickly to avoid predation, yet meet a secondary purpose of being able to quickly regain the bottom during the common events of stream bed dislocation or behavioral drift/hatching requirements? Their shape is so efficient that even with feeble swimming effort the current well force them down rather quickly, similar to the effect of an airplane elevator. I would argue that it's morphology has little to do with the adaptive needs of hanging onto the surface of cobble exposed to currents. The laminar flow effect diagram misses the point in my opinion. Not that the flows as diagrammed aren't accurate, but rather they are superfluous as they measure gradations from not moving to barely moving. Again, baetids hold on the tops of rocks well elevated on their claws with little apparent effort, even in the swiftest riffles.
"It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman
PaulRobertsFebruary 24th, 2013, 4:05 pm
Colorado

Posts: 1755
Baetids are also hydrofoils, but fusiform in shape -fishlike. There's more than one way to skin a cat.

Claws are definitely important too, for all fast water dwellers.
EntomanFebruary 24th, 2013, 4:14 pm
Site Editor
Northern CA & ID

Posts: 2604
Agreed, but their legs in the vertical posture would negate that, would it not? Perhaps their shape has more to do with swimming in open currents (with their legs swept back against their bodies) than maintaining grip in the soft flows adjacent to the substrate?

BTW - What's your experience/opinion with/of the "suction gill" theory? Fact or Fiction...?:)
"It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman
BrookymanFebruary 24th, 2013, 4:14 pm
Banned
Posts: 797
Hey Kurt Your touching base with my comment sorta maybe.
Banned for threatening another user and then trying to circumvent a kinder "soft" ban with fake accounts
EntomanFebruary 24th, 2013, 4:20 pm
Site Editor
Northern CA & ID

Posts: 2604
You mean about the claws, Mack? If so yes, in a roundabout way.
"It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman
BrookymanFebruary 24th, 2013, 4:31 pm
Banned
Posts: 797
The dynamics of a wing shape and how they apply to the larva's body shape and its components. Claws to, they are the anchor.
Banned for threatening another user and then trying to circumvent a kinder "soft" ban with fake accounts
PaulRobertsFebruary 24th, 2013, 4:45 pm
Colorado

Posts: 1755
BTW - What's your experience/opinion with/of the "suction gill" theory? Fact or Fiction...?:)

None. Sounds like a good idea. But I'm not aware of any good literature.
EntomanFebruary 24th, 2013, 5:03 pm
Site Editor
Northern CA & ID

Posts: 2604
Mack - Sorry, I didn't pick up on that in your post.


Paul - Yeah, same with me. I don't know of any papers that directly address this issue either, though there are many that simply mention the concept in passing as a given. I also have no anecdotal experience with it (that I'm aware of), in spite of picking countless Western March Browns off of rocks over the years. I always assumed because of their flat bodies and grippy strong legs that they were just hard to get a hold of. Don't know about it being a good idea, though.:)
"It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman
TroutnutSeptember 26th, 2015, 8:26 pm
Administrator
Fairbanks, AK

Posts: 2420
I just noticed this really interesting discussion from a couple years ago and am bumping it up to reply (although it looks like some other posts already made these points).

A large portion of the invertebrate drift in most rivers consists of bugs drifting by accident. This increases substantially at higher water velocities, which probably means the insects are affected by the hydraulic forces on the rocks. Velocity at the bottom is lower than elsewhere, but it's not negligible, and it can be turbulent. I think the conventional wisdom is probably right with regard to adaptations like flattened bodies and suction-cup-like gills giving insects an advantage in this environment. They may not need this advantage all the time, but it comes in handy often enough that it exerted selective pressure on these species over many generations.
Jason Neuswanger, Ph.D.
Troutnut and salmonid ecologist
PaulRobertsSeptember 27th, 2015, 8:45 am
Colorado

Posts: 1755
Thanks for bringing this back up, Jason. And for your comments.
SteamntroutJune 14th, 2017, 9:46 am
Posts: 3Reading your description and analysis is truly enlightening, I would have to agree with your analysis.

Quick Reply

You have to be logged in to post on the forum. It's this easy:
Username:          Email:

Password:    Confirm Password:

I am at least 13 years old and agree to the rules.

Related Discussions

TitleRepliesLast Reply
Re: caddis larva beh;a;vior question (really!)
In Brachycentrus Caddisfly Pupa by CaseyP
10Dec 20, 2009
by LittleJ
Re: Lepidostoma sp.
(5 more)

In the Identify This! Board by Millcreek
6Apr 19, 2015
by Millcreek
Re: How to catagorize 2 and 3 tailed mayflies?
In the Insect Order Ephemeroptera by Riverratben
13Jun 14, 2012
by Brookyman
Re: What did I catch?!
In Fishing Reports by JedFinley
7Sep 5, 2013
by Jmd123
Re: ?s on larvae IDs
In Limnephilidae Caddisfly Larva by GONZO
4May 22, 2008
by GONZO
Re: Cahills hatching characteristics and swimming ability
In Stenacron interpunctatum Mayfly Nymph by Chadwick
1Jul 2, 2009
by GONZO
Re: Emerging Isonychia nymph
In General Discussion by Troutnut
2Oct 7, 2006
by Troutnut
Re: Stillwater Mayfly Nymph Collection Techniques
In the Insect Order Ephemeroptera by Taxon
9Aug 11, 2011
by Goose
Re: Gorgeous photos!
In Female Helopicus subvarians Stonefly Adult by Jmd123
13Jan 29, 2011
by Entoman
Re: central penna mayfly nymphs
In the Identify This! Board by Gutcutter
8Jun 14, 2010
by JOHNW
Most Recent Posts
Re: Old Nerversink River
In The Neversink River by Mtvernon (Davem replied)
Re: closing the gender gap in flyfishing
In General Discussion by Konchu (Jmd123 replied)
Re: To Handle Or Not To Handle When Releasing A Trout
In General Discussion by Hellgramite (Jmd123 replied)
Re: Quick evening trip to the mountains
In Site Updates by Troutnut (Peter21 replied)
Re: Tackle on Jets
In Gear Talk by Davem (Martinlf replied)
Re: Indiana flying insect ID - Thanksgiving 2017
In the Identify This! Board by Bnorikane (Millcreek replied)
Re: Great streamer action
In Fishing Reports by Wbranch
Re: Aeshna naiad
In the Identify This! Board by Millcreek (Jmd123 replied)
Re: Introduction
In Beginner Help by David82nd (Iasgair replied)
Re: using a size 5 reel for smaller 4x
In Gear Talk by Yubablue (Iasgair replied)