Troutnut.com Fly Fishing for Trout Home
User Password
or register.
Scientific name search:

> > Anyone know your western Drunella species?, Page 2

The Specimen

Drunella doddsii (Western Green Drake) Mayfly DunDrunella doddsii (Western Green Drake) Mayfly Dun View 7 PicturesI still haven't got my good camera gear set up, but I wanted to get my first Alaskan bug specimen online, so I photographed this one with my point+shoot in the raft.
Collected July 8, 2007 from the Gulkana River in Alaska
Added to Troutnut.com by on July 19, 2007

The Discussion

DarkDunOctober 19th, 2007, 9:34 am
Posts: 16No one has mentioned size in these discussions. Is this not relevent?
In the central rockies I fish a size 10 for Grandis and a size 12 for Doddsi and a 14 for Flavilinea and they have to be that if you want to catch big trout. In the east the Lata is mostly a size 16 hook. Glacialis is apparently a size 8 to be fished properly although I have never fished this species.
That is my fly fishers take on Western Green Drakes.
DarkDunOctober 19th, 2007, 9:36 am
Posts: 16No one has mentioned size in these discussions. Is this not relevent?
In the central rockies I fish a size 10 for Grandis and a size 12 for Doddsi and a 14 for Flavilinea and they have to be that if you want to catch big trout. In the east the Lata is mostly a size 16 hook. Glacialis is apparently a size 8 to be fished properly although I have never fished this species.
That is my fly fishers take on Western Green Drakes.
GONZOOctober 21st, 2007, 11:38 am
Site Editor
"Bear Swamp," PA

Posts: 1681
DD-

Yes, size does matter. :) However, as an aid to identification (or even imitation) it's just not as reliable or consistent as some fly-fishing texts would lead one to believe. For example, you mention that the Eastern lata that you see are about #16. On Pocono waters, the early lata that I so love to fish (the ones that used to be known as cornuta) are more like a #14, with many of the female duns closer to a standard #12. The later-hatching lata on those waters are about #16, or even #18. That's quite a range of sizes. It just goes to show why careful observation and local knowledge are so important.

By the way, how's the water down in your neck of the woods? It's been low for most of the season in much of the East, but I understand that the Southeast is in especially tough shape.

Best,
Gonzo
EntomanApril 12th, 2012, 4:51 pm
Northern CA & ID

Posts: 2604
They weren't mentioned in this topic, but relative corpulence and silhouette are important (and the easiest) characters useful in telling doddsii apart from the grandis subspecies. Once becoming familiar with these critters streamside, they can be used to identify them at a glance in the adult stages. Though they all have stout thoraxes, it's the abdominal taper where the difference is most obvious. The grandis group (as with the flavilinea group on the other end of the size scale) has the more typical ephemerellid looking abrubt change in diameter from abdomen to thorax and the abdominal taper is much less dramatic where the first four segs are pretty close to the same diameter. With doddsii, the first segment of the abdomen is nearly as stout as the thorax with the rest tapering exaggeratedly to the terminal segs (check the ventral photo of this specimen).

Size is only reliable when compared against the other species groups in a particular watershed. D. doddsii always occupies the middle ground in my experience. This may mean size 12 in one location or a large 10 in another. I have not found characters like color, leg shape, or wing and tail length ratios to be reliable.

D. doddsii adults are perhaps one of the most misidentified species in photos on western flyshop websites (and even in some angler entomologies), which really adds to the confusion.

Nymphs are usually even easier to determine. Many seem to have trouble (probably due to lack of familiarity) and focus on frontal shelves and leg descriptions as provided in dichotomous keys. Others comment that they can't tell unless a ventral is provided showing a suction disk of circular hairs. It's easier than that because none of the large western species (or subs) of this genus are nearly as corpulent and lacking in tergal and head tubercles.
"It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman
Page:12

Quick Reply

You have to be logged in to post on the forum. It's this easy:
Username:          Email:

Password:    Confirm Password:

I am at least 13 years old and agree to the rules.

Related Discussions

TitleRepliesLast Reply
Re: Drunella grandis species complex
In the Identify This! Board by Crepuscular
2Aug 2, 2019
by Crepuscular
Re: Fearsome
In Drunella grandis Mayfly Nymph by Martinlf
1Aug 14, 2020
by Troutnut
Re: Guess this nymph
In the Identify This! Board by Troutnut
7Jul 19, 2011
by Troutnut
Re: collected from Bitterroot yesterday Drake
In the Identify This! Board by Leskorcala
4Jun 17, 2020
by Leskorcala
Re: Ephemerellinae
In the Mayfly Family Ephemerellidae by GONZO
7Oct 4, 2008
by GONZO
Re: A Couple Bugs I Ran Into Yesterday
In the Identify This! Board by DayTripper
7May 12, 2008
by GONZO
Re: Insect photos on CatskillFlies website
In the Mayfly Genus Ephemerella by Jpsully
4May 24, 2008
by Softhackle
Re: Need help identifying!!
In the Identify This! Board by Jsawatzky
5Jul 5, 2015
by Creno
Re: Could it be?
In the Identify This! Board by Wiflyfisher
14Jun 15, 2008
by Wiflyfisher
Re: Is anyone here from Colorado
In General Discussion by Sundula
33Nov 2, 2012
by Oldredbarn
Most Recent Posts
Re: Trico Spinner, as requested
In the Identify This! Board by Gutcutter (Wiflyfisher replied)
Re: Trico nymphs and emergers
In the Mayfly Genus Tricorythodes by Steamntrout (Martinlf replied)
Re: Holy Grail Caddis pupa
In Fly Tying by Coha (Wbranch replied)
Re: Centroptilum
In the Identify This! Board by Wbranch (Konchu replied)
Re: Jonathon's moving again...
In General Discussion by Jmd123 (Martinlf replied)
Re: Bald-Tailed Baetidae
In General Discussion by Dickybird (Konchu replied)
Re: 2 insect wing vein questions, and 1 on etymology
In General Discussion by Dickybird (Troutnut replied)
Re: Is this :-)
In Mystery Creek # 256 by SantaSa (Troutnut replied)
Re: New to Northern New Mexico
In Beginner Help by Tarponfly (Retyer replied)
Re: Valles Caldera: East fork Jemez River and San Antonio Creek
In Fishing Reports by Red_green_h (Taoski replied)