Fly Fishing for Trout Home
User Password
or register.
Scientific name search:

> > Ptilostomis male genitalia

Taju has attached this picture to aid in identification. The message is below.
View Full SizeView Full Size (1.1X larger)
TajuNovember 16th, 2008, 1:05 am
Hartola, Finland

Posts: 11
Hi again,

in the web I found the pictures of male genitalia of P. ocellifera and semifasciata, and I think that I also have some males of ocellifera. But what is this one?
CrenoNovember 16th, 2008, 10:03 am
Grants Pass, OR

Posts: 305
If this is a North American phryganid I could propose either P. ocellifera or P. postica but that would mean that most of the parts are highly retracted. It doesn't seem likely that these two appendages (presumably the lateral arms of the 10th?)would be so obvious without some of the other appendages being visible as well. It just doesn't look right.

try a caudal and/or dorsal view if possible.
TajuNovember 16th, 2008, 12:21 pm
Hartola, Finland

Posts: 11
Compared to P. ocellifera dorsal appendages are missing, they are very visible in my 3 ocellifera specimens. But I have 3 more similarly constructed male genitalia (in those specimens the forewing is darker than in ocellifera). I'll try to make more photoes.
MartinlfNovember 16th, 2008, 1:12 pm
Palmyra PA

Posts: 3233
Whoa, and I thought Taxon could post up some racy pics. You caddis guys all must have dirty minds.

OK, just kidding! And mostly to pick on Roger some, who missed the latest round of razzing on this site. Auction me off, indeed!

In all seriousness, I am in awe of anyone who can identify caddis. Until I'm retired and have lots of time, I won't even pretend to begin to try.
"He spread them a yard and a half. 'And every one that got away is this big.'"

--Fred Chappell
TaxonNovember 16th, 2008, 1:54 pm
Site Editor
Royse City, TX

Posts: 1350
Hi Louis-

Upon seeing this thread, and before anyone had responded to it, the first thing that crossed my mind was, oh oh, this will certainly exceed Louis's threshold for specificity.

Best regards,
Roger Rohrbeck
CrenoNovember 16th, 2008, 2:00 pm
Grants Pass, OR

Posts: 305
Careful what you say about us taxonomists. After all, once the fisherfolks started looking at fish food I think they stepped up from fish-squeezing to bottom-grabbing. And that photo is not even of the real parts :)

Quick Reply

You have to be logged in to post on the forum. It's this easy:
Username:          Email:

Password:    Confirm Password:

I am at least 13 years old and agree to the rules.

Related Discussions

TitleRepliesLast Reply
Re: Ptilostomis?
In the Identify This! Board by Taju
3Nov 15, 2008
Re: identification needed
In Rhithrogena impersonata Mayfly Nymph by Kinza
2Feb 6, 2017
by Crepuscular
Re: Unidentified Mayfly
In the Identify This! Board by And
7Jun 19, 2008
by And
Re: Male spinner. Isonychia ?
In the Photography Board by Wystone
3Aug 12, 2007
by JAD
Re: Not invaria
In Male Eurylophella Mayfly Spinner by GONZO
2May 24, 2009
Re: Lots of new specimens today (June 4th) from PA
In General Discussion by Troutnut
8Jun 5, 2007
by Dinerobyn
I. hansoni
In Isogenoides hansoni Stonefly Nymph by GONZO
Re: Big and Little Hexes?
In the Identify This! Board by CaseyP
7Jul 4, 2013
by CaseyP
Re: A few bugs from the Kinderhook Creek (NY)
In the Identify This! Board by Agresens
3Jun 27, 2018
by Konchu
Re: Gender
In Female Hesperophylax designatus Caddisfly Adult by JpMcKenzie
1Dec 16, 2017
by Creno