Troutnut.com Fly Fishing for Trout Home
User Password
or register.
Scientific name search:

> > Finally my "Stenonema" section isn't empty

The Specimen

The Discussion

TroutnutMay 18th, 2007, 11:49 am
Administrator
Bellevue, WA

Posts: 2717
I've been looking for one of these for a while. After I realized that everything I was calling Stenonema had been renamed to Maccaffertium, the section for this once-popular genus was empty. Now with this one from a small stream in the Catskills I'm pretty sure I've got an actual Stenonema again.

I would welcome a verification from those of you with more entomological training, but it looks right to me.
Jason Neuswanger, Ph.D.
Troutnut and salmonid ecologist
QuillgordonMay 20th, 2007, 6:09 pm
Schuylkill County, PA.

Posts: 109
Is this insect in this genus solely based on its gill structure?
It seems odd that there is only one species in this new classification.
I think I have a specimen that was found on 5/18/07.
Flyfishing is a state of mind! .............. Q.g.

C/R........barbless
TroutnutMay 20th, 2007, 6:40 pm
Administrator
Bellevue, WA

Posts: 2717
I don't know, but I doubt the gill structure is the entire reason for genus differentiation. It's probably just the most visible of many differences.
Jason Neuswanger, Ph.D.
Troutnut and salmonid ecologist

Quick Reply

You have to be logged in to post on the forum. It's this easy:
Username:          Email:

Password:    Confirm Password:

I am at least 13 years old and agree to the rules.
Most Recent Posts
Re: Missouri River
In Fishing Reports by Wbranch
Re: Mayfly ID
In the Identify This! Board by JSY (Jmd123 replied)
Re: Hardy reels for 1&4 wt TXL
In Gear Talk by MFFR
Re: Sad news from February about Creno (Dave Ruiter)
In General Discussion by Troutnut (Jmd123 replied)