Fly Fishing for Trout Home
User Password
or register.
Scientific name search:

> > Lost my waterproof camera

CrepuscularApril 3rd, 2012, 10:12 am
Boiling Springs, PA

Posts: 923
OK looking to replace my waterproof point and shoot. My old one, a Pentax Optio W20, was supprising adept at shooting macro. So does anyone have any experience with the new Pentax Opito WG1 or WG-2, or the Nikon AW 100? Specifically with macro performance?
EntomanApril 4th, 2012, 1:44 am
Northern CA & ID

Posts: 2604
I've heard great things about them, Eric. I think what you lose in image quality to the Canon D10 for general use, you gain in a smaller package and the improved diode lighting for macros of bugs when the natural light is less than perfect. The Canon though has optical stabilization which is a big feature for those times when the critters won't stand still long enough to mount the camera on something. I see you can get a new one online for $250 or thereabouts (WG-1) which is a hundred less than last year.
"It's not that I find fishing so important, it's just that I find all other endeavors of Man equally unimportant... And not nearly as much fun!" Robert Traver, Anatomy of a Fisherman
JesseApril 4th, 2012, 1:54 am
Posts: 378
Olympus waterproof cameras are great man. I have a TG-310 and it takes some great shots!
Most of us fish our whole lives..not knowing its not the fish that we are after.
TroutnutApril 4th, 2012, 2:28 am
Bellevue, WA

Posts: 2737
I have a Canon D10, which they recently updated with a newer model, the D20 (not to be confused with the old 20D). The D20 looks pretty nice.

Check out the Panasonic Lumix waterproof cameras, too. The Lumix cameras are an excellent product line, though I don't have one of the waterproof ones.
Jason Neuswanger, Ph.D.
Troutnut and salmonid ecologist
CrepuscularApril 4th, 2012, 8:57 am
Boiling Springs, PA

Posts: 923
Thanks for your input! It is very helpful! My wife has a canon point and shoot but its macro performance is very weak when compared with my old pentax. I'm not too worried about photos other than macro stuff. I guess I'll have to research those cameras a little more. The led's on the pentax specifically for macro makes that camera intriguing, but the cynic in me thinks that that may just be fluff to cover up lack-luster optics. I didn't want to have the spend the money on a new camera, That money could be spent filling up the Tahoe on a weekend fishing excursion...crazy gas prices :(
JesseApril 4th, 2012, 12:01 pm
Posts: 378
The TG-310 Olympus that i told you i have comes with a macro, super marcro, and super macro LED settings. I am sure the newer one comes with the same setting maybe even better picture. Check her out!
Most of us fish our whole lives..not knowing its not the fish that we are after.

Quick Reply

You have to be logged in to post on the forum. It's this easy:
Username:          Email:

Password:    Confirm Password:

I am at least 13 years old and agree to the rules.

Related Discussions

TitleRepliesLast Reply
Re: Hi All, new to the forum
In the Photography Board by Kroil
7Mar 13, 2008
by Wbranch
Re: Photograqphy questions from Konchu
In the Photography Board by Gripngrin
3Nov 25, 2006
by Troutnut
Re: Camera protection
In the Photography Board by Delablobbo
1Mar 20, 2010
by Wiflyfisher
Re: New tech.
In the Photography Board by Chris_3g
3Jul 29, 2008
by Trtklr
Re: Kennebago Mayfly
In the Identify This! Board by Kennebago
3Jan 10, 2012
by Entoman
Re: My first aquatic insect photos; open for identification
In the Photography Board by Bcvizina
4Mar 16, 2010
by Wiflyfisher
Re: Looking for a New DSLR?
In the Photography Board by FisherOfMen
13Feb 18, 2012
by FisherOfMen
Re: Waterproof Cameras
In the Photography Board by PESCATORE
7Aug 4, 2016
Re: Caddis who?
In the Identify This! Board by Wiflyfisher
14May 27, 2016
by Adirman
Re: Advise on best compact P & S camera for macro field use?
In the Photography Board by Entoman
13Feb 15, 2011
by Entoman