Troutnut.com Fly Fishing for Trout Home
User Password
or register.

Troutnut Forum > Specimen Discussion > hook size (and chocolate duns, and old-timey mayfly family classifications)

The Specimen

Eurylophella (Chocolate Duns) Mayfly NymphEurylophella (Chocolate Duns) Mayfly NymphView 5 PicturesThis nymph is an extremely early instar (Instar: Many invertebrates molt through dozens of progressively larger and better-developed stages as they grow. Each of these stages is known as an instar. Hard-bodied nymphs typically molt through more instars than soft-bodied larvae.).
Region: Upper Midwest
Collected Feb 7, 2004
Added Jan 25, 2006

The Discussion

WarrenApril 12th, 2007, 3:30 pm
franklin nc

Posts: 4
thats about a size 32 right. i dont think i have any tippet that small
warren
These advertisements will disappear if you register.
Replies:
TroutnutApril 12th, 2007, 4:39 pm
Fairbanks, AK

Posts: 1115
Hehe, that's a good bit smaller than a 32. I think you'll only need to imitate something this small when nymphing if you're "nymphing" for nymphs in the same sense that you could be "fishing" for fish.

If you find a hook that small, you could also use it for the water mite hatch.
Jason Neuswanger
The Troutnut
QuillgordonApril 12th, 2007, 8:34 pm
Schuylkill County, PA.

Posts: 97
Warren,
I believe Jason said it was an immature nymph, so it still had some growing to do! I would say tye it in a size #16.

Jason,
Thomas Ames labeled the 'chocolate dun' ..... Ephemerella needhami. @ bottom of 3rd. paragraph
ttp://www.thomasames.com/insects/article/wintercad/wintercad.htm
the little Chocolate Dun, Ephemerella needhami.

Ernest Schwiebert,Jr. has it in the family 'Baetidae'.
Is this still true today, or have they been re-classified?
John
Flyfishing is a state of mind! .............. Q.g.

C/R........barbless
TroutnutApril 12th, 2007, 9:45 pm
Fairbanks, AK

Posts: 1115
Lots of things have been called "chocolate duns" by somebody at some point, including E. needhami. See my page on the Chocolate Dun common name for the whole list.

It seems like almost every mayfly was in the Baetidae at one point or another; at least the species which were first described long ago. Maybe one of the entomologists here can fill in the history on that, but I get the impression maybe all mayflies were considered to be in the Baetidae family sometime in the 1800s before they had been seriously studied.

Anyway, Eurylophella has been in the Ephemerellidae family for a long time, but that might not have been the case when Schwiebert was first writing.
Jason Neuswanger
The Troutnut
KonchuApril 12th, 2007, 10:30 pm
Indiana

Posts: 200
Ephemerellidae was first recognized as a formal family in 1909. In 1935, it was recognized as a subfamily of the Baetidae. The group was again recognized as a family in 1954. People who put Eurylophella in Baetidae after '54 probably were using an old reference (The Biology of Mayflies. Needham, Traver & Hsu. 1935. Ithaca, NY: Comstock P) and had not kept current with the scattered papers associated with the science. I've seen recent field guides that still put Eurylophella and other "Ephemerellidae" in Baetidae. In the old system, Ephemeridae, Baetidae and Heptageniidae pretty much were it as far as families went. Alas, the days of olde...

Jason: If you wish to duplicate this to a new thread, please do so. The subject has drifted (pun intended) from hook sizes.
GONZOApril 13th, 2007, 1:33 am
"Bear Swamp," PA

Posts: 876
If John is referring to Schwiebert's Matching the Hatch, it was written in 1955 (the year of my birth) and it does follow the Ephemeridae/Baetidae/Heptageniidae structure of a much simpler time.

John,
You'll get confused a lot by following that old book, but one thing that will help is to check Taxon's website. He has done taxonomic updates for many popular fly fishing entomologies. If he has one for MtH, you could probably print it out and keep it inside the book for reference. Trust me, that will save a lot of frustrating translation!
TaxonApril 13th, 2007, 4:41 am
Mercer Island, WA

Posts: 485
Gonzo & John-

Unfortunately, I don't have taxonomic updates for Schwiebert's Matching The Hatch on my website, simply because I don't have that book. However I do have taxonomic updates for Schwiebert's Nymphs, which would likely include all (or most) of the taxa listed in MtH.
Roger Rohrbeck
www.FlyfishingEntomology.com
QuillgordonApril 13th, 2007, 8:57 am
Schuylkill County, PA.

Posts: 97

If John is referring to Schwiebert's Matching the Hatch, it was written in 1955 (the year of my birth) and it does follow the Ephemeridae/Baetidae/Heptageniidae structure of a much simpler time.

Gonzo........... Yes


Anyway, Eurylophella has been in the Ephemerellidae family for a long time, but that might not have been the case when Schwiebert was first writing.

Jason..... Thank you. I thought that might be the case.


Jason: If you wish to duplicate this to a new thread, please do so. The subject has drifted (pun intended) from hook sizes.

Konchu....I mentioned T. Ames and E. Schwiebert,Jr. because Warren posted under the photo of the 'chocolate dun'.....Eurylophella ......

Thanks.....



Flyfishing is a state of mind! .............. Q.g.

C/R........barbless
TroutnutApril 13th, 2007, 11:13 am
Fairbanks, AK

Posts: 1115
Well, the subject of hook sizes was a bit of a joke I think, and it has been addressed, so this thread can wander wherever it wants to. However, I will change the title of the thread to reflect the new directions.
Jason Neuswanger
The Troutnut
GONZOApril 13th, 2007, 4:10 pm
"Bear Swamp," PA

Posts: 876
John,

Just to be clear (and because I know how confusing this gets), the "chocolate dun" that Ames and Schwiebert refer to, Ephemerella needhami, is still a valid species name in the family Ephemerellidae. The "chocolate dun" of this thread, Eurylophella sp., is a different genus, but also in the family Ephemerellidae. Multiple-use common names are often the cause of confusion. (Think of all the species of various genera that fly fishers call "blue-winged olives.")
QuillgordonApril 13th, 2007, 4:42 pm
Schuylkill County, PA.

Posts: 97
Gonzo,
Ok...... I didn't see that when I was looking at the different groups, but I see it listed now.
Ephemerella needhami.

T. Ames called it the 'chocolate dun', but E. Schwiebert didn't. His immatation was a 'dark ephemerella nymph' #16; the dun being the 'red quill'( male hendrickson). So I guess it was a 'dark hendrickson' to him.

Ok.......... I feel better now!
Flyfishing is a state of mind! .............. Q.g.

C/R........barbless
Most Recent Posts
Re: Help unsticking my fly rod
In General Discussion by Freepow
Re: Fly rods
In General Discussion by Martinlf
Re: Yearly Hatches
In General Discussion by Vermonter
Re: Night-fishing for trout
In General Discussion by Vermonter
Re: You Guys Hate Me Yet :) More pics
In the Identify This! Board by Taxon
Re: Leaders?
In General Discussion by Troutster
Re: Out from Montana, Neversink???
In General Discussion by Martinlf
Middle Lehigh River 5-15-2008
In Fishing Reports by JOHNW
Re: key of mayllies larvae
In the Mayfly Genus Ephemerella by Konchu
Re: WI contingent
In General Discussion by Freepow
Re: Wisconsin trout pics
In the Photography Board by Smallstream
Re: Aqua Glo glow in the dark dressing for flies
In General Discussion by Vermonter
Re: Added more Heptagenia culacantha info
In the Mayfly Species Heptagenia culacantha by Taxon
Wild Browns
In the Photography Board by BGrnFlyfish
Re: Battenkill Bugs
In the Identify This! Board by DayTripper