Troutnut Forum > Specimen Discussion > Diphetor

The Specimen

The Discussion

Earlfishman	April 12th, 2007, 12:20 am
Posts: 17	Jason, I really enjoy your site, you've got some great photos and some really good info. I just wanted to let you know that this mayfly looks like it might actually be a Baetis sp., not a Diphetor hageni. Diphetor's antenna would be much closer together at the base and there would definitely be no gill on ab seg. 1. I can't give you a sure ID without photos of the front of the head and the mouth parts. Keep up the good work. Earl
These advertisements will disappear if you register. Replies:
Troutnut	April 13th, 2007, 12:53 am
Fairbanks, AK Posts: 1115	Hi Earl, Glad you like the site. I just re-traced my ID of this specimen in the keys in Merrit & Cummins, and I branch away from Baetis with this one at a couplet checking to see whether a femoral villopore is present. I can't see one on this specimen, so I followed a sequence which led to Diphetor. Perhaps my pictures aren't detailed enough with regard to that feature? If this becomes really interesting, I can pick the specimen back out of the alcohol and check for that under a microscope. For now I'm going to take your "not Diphetor" ID and reclassify this one as an unknown Baetid.
	Jason Neuswanger The Troutnut
Konchu	April 13th, 2007, 10:25 am
Indiana Posts: 200	Villipore is often difficult to see; try keying it again, if you get the chance, under the assumption that the villipore is present. What do you get?
Troutnut	April 13th, 2007, 11:04 am
Fairbanks, AK Posts: 1115	In that case, Baetis. I'll move it there for now. It is frustrating that even when I take a bunch of really close-up pictures I still don't have what I need to see many of the key features used in identification. I wish I had an electron microscope!
	Jason Neuswanger The Troutnut
Earlfishman	April 13th, 2007, 6:37 pm
Posts: 17	The villipore is actually nearly impossible to see without a compound scope, I really don't like that character. Keep in mind that when you get to that couplet, you are heading towards only 4 genera. Both Diphetor hageni and Fallceon quilleri have a distinct keel between the antennal bases and Diphetor has no gill on ab 1. Cloedes is seriously geographically restricted and Acerpenna has the pointy gill on seg 7 and a really thick terminal abdominal filament. Baetis sp. is a safe place to leave that bug. Earl
Troutnut	April 13th, 2007, 11:10 pm
Fairbanks, AK Posts: 1115	Thanks Earl! That should really simplify some of my future ID work. Are you a professional entomologist?
	Jason Neuswanger The Troutnut

Copyright © 2008 Jason Neuswanger (email Jason). See my FAQ for information about use of my images.
If you use an RSS newsreader, you can subscribe to this site's updates with this link: