Troutnut Forum > Fly Fishing Discussion > Fly rods
| Chris_3g | January 1st, 2007, 6:55 pm | |
| Ithaca, NY Posts: 35 | Happy New Year everyone, and I hope everyone had a Merry Christmas as well! When I started out this fall, I purchased a Cortland outfit off of eBay for $100 - I didn't want to spend a lot of money since I was picking this out as a gift for me from someone else. Anyway, the outfit included an 8.5' 6/7 weight rod and a 6WF line - the rod appears to be medium to fast action and Cortland touts it as a "crisp action rod." After researching more extensively, I realized that I might have been better off with a 5/6 weight and a 5WF (or DT?) line instead. Anyway, my question is, am I shooting myself in the foot by fishing with this tackle in the streams I'm fishing - smaller streams 15-30 feet wide 2-5 feet deep with rainbows, browns, and brookies. I really don't want to sink another $200 or more into a new rod after only having my current rig for a few months. However, if the tackle is too big for the water I'm fishing, I don't want to waste my time scaring fish all day long either. Can I use a 5WF (or DT?) line on a 6/7 weight rod without too much trouble - I believe this is termed underlining? I'm not currently at a skill level where I would notice the advantages of the numerous rod technologies, but I assume the fish will notice a heavier line hitting the water. I just wanted to hear everyone's opinion on the matter and also see if there are some specific brands I might look at if my current tackle isn't suitable. Also, if I'm getting a new rod, should I go with a new reel as well? Thanks a lot. Chris. | |
|
These advertisements will disappear if you register. | ||
| JAD | January 1st, 2007, 9:23 pm | |
| Butler--- Western Pa Posts: 157 | Hi Chris You might have opened a can of worms---Opps. Theirs many types of fisherman and styles and many roads to travel. I think what you have selected, will work till your skill level increases .One of the best fisherman I know, and fish with uses a noodle rod with the but end hacked sawed off, with an old automatic South Bend reel. He uses the $19.95 cheap Cortland Fair Play Line, the man is a master at catching fish. I personally like long 9 foot 3 wt rods but that's me Gonzo likes shorter rods(I think) and Jason likes something different. I don't think theirs a right answer. Hope this helps. JaD | |
| Stupid is forever, ignorance can be fixed. | ||
| Upnorth2 | January 2nd, 2007, 6:35 am | |
| Wisconsin Posts: 62 | I have a Penn 4-weight I like for streams like that. Different for everyone. Penn has a new line of rods out finally. They look great. Each to his own. 6/7 would have been too much for me. | |
| Martinlf | January 2nd, 2007, 10:27 am | |
| Palmyra PA Posts: 907 | JaD is right, different folks have their preferences, and no one but you will be able to settle this issue once and for all. That said, I'll venture a few observations. First off, on underlining--when I first started fishing, I was reluctant to use a line that didn't exactly fit the weight printed on the rod. A few trips where I had the wrong spool for a rod and had to make do quickly taught me that if you can make it work, it can work. So here is my recommendation. If you want to fish with a 5 wt. line, buy an inexpensive 5 wt. line and try casting it on your rod. See how it feels to you, and see if you can get the kind of loops and casts that you need to make. If you can make it work, it will work just fine. Or, fish the 6 weight. Some very good fishermen prefer rods much like yours for all around fishing. They make the rods work by casting lightly when they need to, and avoiding line slap. If the fish are stocked, using a 6 weight probably won't make that much difference in many cases, if your casting and leader are right. For wild fish, or for low water conditions, you may benefit from a lighter weight rod. If this is the case, I would recommend a medium fast 3 weight, which can be fished with a 3 wt. line or overlined with a 4 wt. to slow the rod down a bit. Or a 4 wt. I believe Temple Fork rods are hard to beat for the money, but that's just one opinion. As for reels, here's my poor man's solution. After reading a bunch of reviews, I bought an Okuma Sierra 4/5 and three extra spools for it. Using gel-spun backing (bright yellow Powerpro line) and cutting the butt ends of the fly line down a bit to shorten my 5 and 6 wt. lines (to accommodate 150+ yards of backing), I was able to set up a 3 wt. spool, a 4 wt. spool, a 5 wt. spool, and a 6 wt. spool to cover a range of situations. I use the same reel on my 3 wt. 7.5 foot Temple Fork rod for small stream fishing that I use for my 5/6 wt. 9 foot BT rod on big rivers, changing the spools to fit my needs. I've landed 20 inch rainbows on the Henry's Fork using that reel, and 4 inch brookies in tiny mountain trickles. If I ever have the money, I'll invest in another reel or two, but until then I prefer to have multiple rods and one trout reel. If you can make the reel you have work for now, getting a couple of spools may help keep your costs down for a while and allow you to experiment with different rods. Until you get into big fish and open water, the reel doesn't usually make or break your effectiveness in playing a fish. For now you may be able to simply set your drag light, and practice palming the rim, if it is exposed for palming, to add drag when you need it. Most of all, keep experimenting and practicing, knowing that many answers will come with time and experience. Now let's hear what others think! | |
| Louis Is it not an art to deceive a trout with an artificial fly? A trout! that is more sharp-sighted than any hawk . . . and more watchful and timorous than your high-mettled merlin is bold! --Izaak Walton The Compleat Angler | ||
| Shawnny3 | January 2nd, 2007, 6:49 pm | |
| Pleasant Gap, PA Posts: 541 | Hey, Chris. What you have may not be ideal for those streams, but I prefer to see people with equipment below their skill level than above it. You don't want to become what I like to call an "owner". An analogy from golf: If you're shanking your garage-sale clubs 50 yards into the woods on every swing, the only thing that shiny new $500 driver is going to do is allow you to shank 100 yards into the woods. And who wants to be the guy shanking the $500 driver? Same applies to fishing - don't waste the money until you can tell the difference. I know Lefty Kreh strongly recommends underlining when fishing spooky fish, and I've heard that he's an OK caster. I personally have not tried it, but the next line I buy will be one grade lighter than my rod, just to try it. I'm pretty frugal with my gear. The heavier rod you now have will allow you to cast farther than you could with a 5-wt, which could be a big advantage if casting distance is a problem for you. Remember, however, the golf example - farther is not always better. In fact, probably the single biggest mistake beginners make is trying to cast farther than their ability allows them to do accurately and in control. If the farthest you can accurately cast and control your line is 10 feet, then never make a cast longer than 10 feet unless you're just practicing. Instead, learn how to approach fish stealthily (a great skill to have anyway) and make solid, controlled casts. I routinely catch savvy fish at distances of 10 feet on dry flies - I say this not to brag but to make it clear that fish often find long casts far overrated. I cannot state this too emphatically: LEARN LINE CONTROL FIRST. If you do, you WILL catch fish, and everything else will follow. If you're finding navigating small streams with a long rod cumbersome, choke up on the rod handle - you'll be amazed at how much tighter your line control is just by changing your fulcrum position by six inches. Also, in Ithaca, a 7-wt is a great rod for lake fishing. This spring, take some maribou streamers down to the lighthouse wall and try your luck on some landlocks - if the time is right, that's some pretty cool fishing. Most guys willing to hike the mile out there are pretty serious fishermen, so there are usually some excellent flyfishermen out there who are also really nice guys to talk to and learn from. -Shawn | |
| Jewelry-Quality Artistic Salmon Flies, by Shawn Davis www.davisflydesigns.com | ||
| CaseyP | January 2nd, 2007, 8:03 pm | |
| Arlington, VA/ Mercersburg, PA Posts: 254 | Chris, everyone has their own approach to your problem because we've all been there and all solved it somehow. in our case, our 9 foot 6 weights (freebies from the class we took) were ludicrously oversized for the tiny rivulet we actually learned on. so off to the sporting goods store where we found 6'6" Eagle Claw fly rods for $20 a pop. spouse just used the 6 wt reel. i bought a cheapish 4 wt reel and used lighter line. we both began to catch fish. the cheap rods were awful, but they taught us about what we wanted: short and fastish action. when Significant Events Requiring Presents arrived, we were ready to move up the price ladder knowing much more about how we liked to fish and what would help us do it. we discovered that the long 6 weights are great for "rivers", "ponds" and "lakes", and the short lighter weights are good for anything with "creek", "run", or "brook" in the name. have a good time! Casey P | |
| "You can observe a lot by watching." Yogi Berra | ||
| Martinlf | January 3rd, 2007, 11:53 am | |
| Palmyra PA Posts: 907 | Chris, Shawn's advice on practicing casting and targeting fish at close distances is good. Presentation is the key, and it can be done well with all kinds of rods. If your streams are 15 to 30 feet wide, the 8.5 foot rod should be fine, unless there is considerable brush or overhead cover. If the stream is reasonable open, you can fish with what you have for now, possibly choking up a bit if it helps. That said, Casey's solution of finding an inexpensive shorter rod to play with might be one to consider. | |
| Louis Is it not an art to deceive a trout with an artificial fly? A trout! that is more sharp-sighted than any hawk . . . and more watchful and timorous than your high-mettled merlin is bold! --Izaak Walton The Compleat Angler | ||
| Pbaerman | May 4th, 2007, 1:38 pm | |
| Rochester, Minnesota Posts: 8 | I recently purchased a 9' 5wt Temple Fork with matchign 5WF and I absolutely love it. It is a great all around set up that lets me fish small to big (not that big) water and has preformed well when an unexpected 6lb steelhead found my fly. I completely agree with Martinlf on the Temple Forks being a GREAT(my word)rod for their value. Unless its really big water or really small clear water I use it everywhere. | |
| Many men go fishing all of their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after. ~Henry David Thoreau | ||
| TheMidge | May 6th, 2007, 9:06 am | |
| Massachusetts Posts: 13 | I have a 3wt TFO rod like Martin, and really prefer it in small streams. I have only been fly fishing for a couple of years, so I remember when I was starting out I had similar questions. Until you are a pretty good caster, underlining may make it difficult to control your line, something that can be frustrating as you are learning. If you can swing it, I would recommend picking up a smaller rod for waters like you are talking about. TFO is great for the money, as is Cabelas. My favorite rod is an Elkhorn, but you more or less have to order these online from the company, unless you see them at a show, so you don't get the benefit of trying them out. By doing this, combined with the rig that you already have, you will be geared up to fish pretty much any type of trout water you may encounter, from big western waters to the tiny Brookie streams we encounter so often in the northeast. Just some advice that I have recently learned in the last year. If you are watching the budget, I suggest being cheap with the reel, but go for a quality line. I recieved some of the new Cortland 555 line as a gift, and the difference between that and the low-cost fairplay line that I had been fishing is phenominal. Just my 2 cents | |
| Tahdi | May 15th, 2008, 7:55 pm | |
| New England Posts: 1 | Sorry to intrude, Could someone please tell me what what model TFO & Cabela's outfits they are talking about? I want to purchase one for myself and my fishing partner. Cost is an issue though. I'm looking for 4 or 5 weight outfits. We are both new to fly fishing. We have been using ultralight gear since we were kids though. Most of our fishing is in streams/rivers up to 40 feet across. I saw some outfits at Cabela's with IM6 blanks. I think that would be good. I don't want anything that I'll be tired with. We will probably do mostly roll casts. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks | |
| LittleJ | May 15th, 2008, 8:26 pm | |
| Hollidaysburg Pa Posts: 132 | tfo makes the professional series, I think they are in the $150 range and imo the best budget rod on the market. jeff | |
| Martinlf | May 15th, 2008, 9:08 pm | |
| Palmyra PA Posts: 907 | Cabelas makes fine rods so far as I know. My brother-in-law fishes them all the time. I really like my TFO 7.5 3 weight, but my 8' 4 weight TFO may be a bit too stiff for landing fish when nymphing close in. They seem to "bounce" off more easily. Loren Williams, who has fished on the US team, has advised me to go with softer or longer rods for this kind of fishing, and his advice has seemed to pay off. Instead of the 8' 4 weight TFO, recently I've been using an old St. Croix IM6 7'9" rod I built 20 years ago when I want something a bit bigger (but when a 9' rod is too big) and it seems to keep fish from bouncing off at close range, a problem I had seemed to have with the 8' 4 weight TFO rod. He has recommended an inexpensive medium action Cortland rod for close in nymphing, and I will purchase when I have the money. The 7.5 3 weight TFO seems soft enough. I haven't had bounce problems with it. | |
| Louis Is it not an art to deceive a trout with an artificial fly? A trout! that is more sharp-sighted than any hawk . . . and more watchful and timorous than your high-mettled merlin is bold! --Izaak Walton The Compleat Angler | ||
New features!
