Troutnut.com Fly Fishing for Trout Home
User Password
or register.

Troutnut Forum > Photography > Photograqphy questions from Konchu

GripngrinNovember 25th, 2006, 8:31 pm
Front Range - Colorado

Posts: 17
"I've been thinking of upgrading to something digital for my nature/stream photography, but at this stage of my life am on something of a budget. I currently use Pentax compatible lenses and would like to continue to do so with a new camera body. Do any of you have specific recommendations for a good used camera? Which is better, a digital SLR or straight digital?"
Konchum
Grip'n Grin Mike
These advertisements will disappear if you register.
Replies:
GripngrinNovember 25th, 2006, 8:54 pm
Front Range - Colorado

Posts: 17
Konchu-

If your Pentex lens work on their new digi bodies (K2, K, KA, KAF, and KAF2 Mount), certainly consider that choice. Their new body is a serious contender feature wise, and has garnered good reviews. See: www.steves-digicams.com/2005_reviews/istds2.html
For this quality of a DSLR, the price is very competitive, around $400 I think.

I shoot Canon. During my transition from film to digi, I originally shot a Nikon D100 because of a decent lens collection from film days. After a year it became obvious that Canon has many advantages over Nikon and sold my Nikon system. Both Nikon & Canon lens' are comparable, quality wise. In my opinion, Canon's imaging processing technology is superior. Nikon shooters please chime-in here.

Again, if you have some decent lens that will work on a new body, do it! A decent P&S digi cam will cost as much as the strait Pentex body.

Mike

Grip'n Grin Mike
KonchuNovember 25th, 2006, 9:18 pm
Indiana

Posts: 212
Thanks, Mike, for starting the new thread.
TroutnutNovember 25th, 2006, 10:14 pm
Fairbanks, AK

Posts: 1146
Going strictly by picture quality, a DSLR is your best bet. It's also best if you're looking for maximum custom control over all the camera's functions. I don't know the specifics of Pentax equipment at all because I use Canon, so I'll defer to Mike's judgement on that.

There are a few exceptions, normal digital cameras with very high quality and plenty of custom control over exposure parameters. The Panasonic Lumix DLC-LX2 comes to mind, based on the reviews I've seen (I haven't used it). But as a general rule DSLRs are better.

Portability/durability is a really big factor, too. It's a real pain to carry a DSLR everywhere you go, and it's a big enough investment you'll want to be very careful with it (which gets annoying around the water). A compact digicam is easier to carry around all the time and to protect, especially if you get a waterproof one (like the Pentax waterproof line).
Jason Neuswanger
The Troutnut
Most Recent Posts
Re: October Caddis
In the Caddisfly Genus Dicosmoecus by Trtklr
Re: To eat or not to eat... that is the question.
In General Discussion by Trtklr
Re: Trout stream improvement
In General Discussion by Trtklr
Re: Any experience with this style?
In Fly Tying by Trtklr
Re: Snowshoe Hare
In Fly Tying by Inconnu
Re: Chloroperlidae
In Isoperla Stonefly Adult by Teamrenna
Re: Trout response to rising hot and dry years
In General Discussion by Jjlyon01
Re: Help unsticking my fly rod
In General Discussion by HighFlyer
Re: Clark's Creek, Harrisburg PA - Need Help!
In General Discussion by Martinlf
Re: unknown mites-please help
In the Identify This! Board by Troutnut
Re: Trout - 9, Jamie - 0
In General Discussion by Flyfisher06
Re: Long-time reader, never-time poster? Start here!
In General Discussion by RoyChristie
Re: score
In General Discussion by Al514
Re: Mayfly I.D.
In the Identify This! Board by Taxon
Re: What's the most trout you ever caught in a day?
In General Discussion by MarkP