Troutnut Forum > Fly Fishing Discussion > Chubs: define "caught"
| Troutnut | September 20th, 2006, 12:15 am | |
| Fairbanks, AK Posts: 1144 | I caught seven trout tonight in a really cool small stream, and I also caught several chubs, but I'm not sure exactly how many. So, just for the record, does it count as caught if it flies by my face on the hookset and gets off after it lands? If so, how closely must it whizz by one's face to count? This one was about 18 inches from my head, I think, closer than some that I've unhooked and released. Also, is there a minimum velocity for "caught?" It flew by me pretty fast, but I think with the altitude I got it should count. This is important stuff! | |
| Jason Neuswanger The Troutnut | ||
|
These advertisements will disappear if you register. | ||
| Taxon | September 20th, 2006, 12:52 pm | |
| Mercer Island, WA Posts: 520 | Jason- Sorry, but no, n/a, n/a. You can only count it if intercepted in your net as it whizzes past your ear. | |
| Roger Rohrbeck www.FlyfishingEntomology.com | ||
| GONZO | September 20th, 2006, 1:25 pm | |
| "Bear Swamp," PA Posts: 1003 | Nice form, Jason! I suppose we've all managed to "aerialize" a few chubs from time to time, but your concept of hooking for height and velocity brings it to a new level. You are the Chubmeister; I stand in awe! :) Speaking of achievements in this field, I'd like to nominate one of my fishing buddies for outstanding accomplishment in the category of "aerializing small trout." Whenever we are fishing a small headwater or trib together, he manages to set new records for speed, height, and distance. I cringe when this happens, and I've tried to remind him that he's not competing for the B.A.S.S. title. I often have to scramble to rescue one of his diminutive victims from the bushes. This usually happens after he's gone through several promising pockets without a hit. It seems that his adrenaline reserve builds up such a load that when the rise does come, he explodes--often with truly epic amplitude! I always wonder what these pole-vaulting trout make of the experience. I imagine a conversation with their fellow troutlings: "Beware of the dreaded Elk-Hair Caddis--unless you want to be drafted into the Aquatic Astronaut Corps!" In fairness, I'm sure my friend would be quick to point out that, while he holds clear title to all the speed, height, and distance records, he has watched me make feeble attempts to enter a few fish into the competition. As to the question of what constitutes "caught," no one will begrudge you counting chubs as you see fit. My own fishing records typically follow this formulation: 4 gorgeous wild browns, a couple of stocker rainbows, and a bunch of chucking fubs. :) In the end, it really doesn't matter how you tally the fish you catch and release; eventually we all realize that it is they who capture us. | |
| Troutnut | September 20th, 2006, 3:18 pm | |
| Fairbanks, AK Posts: 1144 | In the end, it really doesn't matter how you tally the fish you catch and release; eventually we all realize that it is they who capture us. Well put! If we're going to add trout to the aerial mix, I'd like to nominate my dad. On our last float on the Brule this summer, he shot three consecutive brookies through the air -- two right into the side of the canoe. He had broken his 5-weight a few nights before, and we don't have many fly rods, so he was fishing a small wet fly for brookies with a 30-year-old fiberglass 7-weight. So the first one was understandable. But after three in a row I was laughing hard enough to scare fish. | |
| Jason Neuswanger The Troutnut | ||
| GONZO | September 20th, 2006, 10:29 pm | |
| "Bear Swamp," PA Posts: 1003 | Jason-- My sincere condolences to your Dad on breaking his 5-weight. I know how painful that can be. And his performance certainly warrants at least an Honorable Mention in the category. I'm afraid it will have to be entered with an asterisk, however, because using a 7-weight to aerialize brookies is like using a corked bat! Tell him he'll have to work on launching a seven-incher with a 6 1/2' 3-weight before he's in serious contention for my friend's title. :o | |
| Massflyfish | September 22nd, 2006, 4:28 pm | |
| Southborough, MA Posts: 3 | On a trip some years ago, a few of us introduced a bass fisherman to flyfishing for trout. We were catching small brookies in a stream that was no wider than 15 feet. The "Bass Fisherman" managed to: 1) Set the hook 2) Reel it in 3) Release the fish in one motion. We couldn't get bass hookset out of his system. He did eventually learn, but it took some practice to change his ways. He now blames us for missing a large bass when he "forgets" to set the hook in a ferocious way while bass fishing. | |
| GONZO | September 22nd, 2006, 6:24 pm | |
| "Bear Swamp," PA Posts: 1003 | Massflyfish- I've often wondered if one of the reasons competitive bass fisherman get their fish to the boat so quickly is that the bass are so stunned by the initial hookset that they forget to fight! | |
| Massflyfish | September 24th, 2006, 11:02 am | |
| Southborough, MA Posts: 3 | 3lb to 4lb fish on 20 lb test!! Do they need to play the fish?? | |
| GONZO | September 24th, 2006, 2:28 pm | |
| "Bear Swamp," PA Posts: 1003 | Good point. To be fair, I realize that they often fish in heavy weeds and pads, and the heavy line is probably justified. And I think fish should be landed quickly; but jerking them directly from hole to hull seems to eliminate one of the main pleasures of catching fish. Competitive fishing seems to shortcut much of the traditional joy of fishing. There is little opportunity to truly enjoy and appreciate each fish, let alone any time to slow down and contemplate the world's navel for awhile. Oh well, to each his own, I suppose. | |
| Troutnut | September 24th, 2006, 3:33 pm | |
| Fairbanks, AK Posts: 1144 | I agree that competitive fishing is a silly distortion of the real thing. But I'm not as opposed to it as most fly fishermen, either. For one thing, it brings in plenty of money for conservation. It's a good economic influence on the whole fishing industry. But that's not the main point. The main point is this: as fishing it sucks, but as a job it's really not too bad. How many B.A.S.S. anglers would be repairing cars or sitting on an assembly line if they weren't jerking largemouths out of a swamp? Plus, there's nothing in the rules that says they can't go fishing for fun after a day of fishing for profit. That's what I would do... Of course, it will be years before competitive creek chub chucking surpasses the popularity of B.A.S.S. When that day comes, I'll be ready! | |
| Jason Neuswanger The Troutnut | ||
| GONZO | September 24th, 2006, 10:46 pm | |
| "Bear Swamp," PA Posts: 1003 | Don't be so quick to dismiss the competitive potential of the chub, Jason. If you checked with one of the European "coarse" fishing associations they may already have a competitive "chub chucking" division. Of course, the European "chub" is a different, much more substantial fish, so you might have to work on your lifting stroke. Who knows, you may have missed your calling! :) | |
| Troutnut | September 25th, 2006, 12:20 am | |
| Fairbanks, AK Posts: 1144 | I know they've got some dandy chubs over in Europe -- maybe more akin to fallfish around here? Still, I would love to see somebody decked out head-to-toe in tackle company logos holding a five-inch creek chub up to the camera! | |
| Jason Neuswanger The Troutnut | ||
| Martinlf | October 31st, 2006, 2:39 pm | |
| Palmyra PA Posts: 972 | Gonzo, I loved the "chucking fub" observation, but have just one question: what is a fub, and just how far can a fub chucker chuck if a fub chucker could chuck fubs? By the way, a friend up on the Delaware calls small browns "corn fielders" for the way they have been known to fly towards (I hope not in) the cornfields along the river. --Louis | |
| Louis Is it not an art to deceive a trout with an artificial fly? A trout! that is more sharp-sighted than any hawk . . . and more watchful and timorous than your high-mettled merlin is bold! --Izaak Walton The Compleat Angler | ||
New features!
