Troutnut Forum

>

Fly Fishing

> So who's making a decent canvas wader right now?

Troutnut	June 21st, 2009, 1:14 am
The Admin Fairbanks, AK Posts: 2020	Most waders on the market right now are labeled as "soft," "comfortable," "breathable," etc. I see all of those things as code words for "pay $300 to wet wade." I'm normally totally in favor of new technology, but in the case of waders it seems the industry has gone crazy. In order to make "breathable" waders from which a little bit of sweat can evaporate, they're all making expensive, flimsy crap that leaks like a sieve if it passes within 10 feet of a rose bush or an especially ambitious mosquito. As if that weren't enough, every time we get into these sieves we get to try to stick two oversized nylon socks into two wet, suctiony, sand-filled boots, and then tie our cold, wet, sandy bootlaces. I've had it with this crap, and the six pairs (Orvis, Simms, Hodgman) that never lasted me more than half a season each. Now I'm trying to find a good new pair of non-breathable, tough-as-nails canvas waders with boots built right onto them. The closer they are to chest-high Xtratuffs, the better. It doesn't seem like many people are making those anymore. A quick search online has me looking at Hodgman Wadewells. Anyone have experience with those, or any others you'd recommend?
	Jason Neuswanger The Troutnut
Wiflyfisher	June 21st, 2009, 6:19 am
Wisconsin Posts: 397	Besides having an expensive pair of Simm's breathable waders I have a pair of Cabela's Three Forks. I use them a lot in NW Wisconsin for fishing because of brush, etc... http://www.cabelas.com/cabelas/en/templates/pod/horizontal-pod.jsp?_DARGS=/cabelas/en/common/catalog/pod-link.jsp_A&_DAV=MainCatcat20431-cat350005_TGP&rid=&indexId=cat350005&navAction=push&masterpathid=&navCount=4&parentType=index&parentId=cat350005&id=0000596
	John S. http://www.WiFlyFisher.com http://flypatternsfortrout.com/
Softhackle	June 21st, 2009, 9:42 am
Site Editor Wellsville, NY Posts: 477	Jason, I don't know about you, but I wore waders like those Hodgman's for years and years and hated them. Big, bulking, clumsy, sweaty. After getting my first pair of "breathable" waders from Cabela's it was like a revelation. Light weight, easy on the body, comfortable, not clumsy or heavy. I am on my second pair and going strong. I guess you are HARD on your waders. I have a pair of the Three Forks from Cabela's I purchased for my Grandson. They're a little tougher, not as heavy and may wear better for you. Mark
	"I have the highest respect for the skilled wet-fly fisherman, as he has mastered an art of very great difficulty." Edward R. Hewitt Flymphs, Soft-hackles and Spiders
RleeP	June 22nd, 2009, 4:21 pm
One Mile South of Lake LeBoeuf Posts: 218	Json: If you're looking for durability, the Cabelas 3 Forks Wiflyfisher linked to are by far the best wader for the price. They're tougher than my Dad's Aunt Ernie (who once shot and cooked a crow to see what it tasted like) and that's tough. At 400+ denier nylon, they can take a lot of scraping and direct hits from branches and the like. They aren't particularly comfortable and are a bit like wearing a suit of mail and they aren't made at all for hot weather wading. Over the years, they've had seepage problems along the seams and in the boot/wader connection, but this is supposedly much better now and at the price, you can afford some extra Aquaseal to keep them going, if needed But they're about as tough and unwussy as waders today get and at 60 bucks a pop, they're a deal and exactly the ticket for the brush busting angler. In fact, I know a pretty fair number of swamp-tromping, beaver spike-dodging duck guys who wear them with cleated shoes and love them. Don't get the bootfoot though. The felts are glued, not stitched and tend to get sucked off the bottom of the boot over time. Not that this is any different than a lot of the lower end wading shoes out there
Falsifly	June 23rd, 2009, 11:17 am
Hayward, WI. Posts: 440	Jason, I for one love my “soft,” “comfortable”, ‘breathable,” etc. waders. However, having never fished the wilderness of Alaska, where the rose bush can attack from 10 feet and the ambitious mosquito can drill holes in boiler plate, I suggest you visit this site: http://www.armorvenue.com/medieval-armor/ You should be able to find something that will protect your expensive fishing gear and may prove invaluable should the bears take a shining to you.
	Falsifly When asked what I just caught that monster on I showed him. He put on his magnifiers and said, "I can't believe they can see that."
Troutnut	June 23rd, 2009, 2:06 pm
The Admin Fairbanks, AK Posts: 2020	Falsifly makes a good point. It is tempting to just patch up my breathable waders, and wear something like this over them: However, I've found that, even while resting quietly in an otherwise empty vacuum chamber, breathable waders tend to spontaneously crack wide open at the seams, not unlike a steamed clam. It may be that they glimpsed a twig through the window and it frightened them into surrender. I think I will give the Cabelas Three Forks a try... sounds like just what I'm looking for. I would rather get a little sweaty over the course of the day than carry a few pounds of water with me in each boot.
	Jason Neuswanger The Troutnut
Aaron7_8	June 27th, 2009, 7:04 pm
Helena Montana Posts: 112	I had a pair of hodgman waders, with the boots attached. In my experience they lasted a year and were more punture resistant, however they weighed more with no water in them thand the lighter weight model that I have now. On the other hand trying to actually fish and travel the bank in the boot attached model was nearly impossible, specially for someone as clumsy as myself.
Lastchance	July 2nd, 2009, 2:47 pm
Portage, PA Posts: 216	I've had nothing but great service from my Hodgman stockingfoot waders. I fish between 50 to 75 times a year and I've gotten at least 3 years out of each pair. I'll be buying another pair shortly. They only cost about $100.
Delablobbo	August 24th, 2009, 8:43 pm
Posts: 19	You're looking for the old Hodgman Wadewells, which I believe you can still buy. I owned a pair and liked them, despite the weight. The real downside to these waders is when they encounter dampness and ozone. The rubber cracks, and the waders become a colander. You don't find this out until the first day of fishing season. They're good, cheap waders, but you really have to take care of them.

Quick Reply

Related Discussions

Title	Replies	Last Reply
Waders In General Discussion by Wbranch	0
Re: Love Guarantees In General Discussion by JAD	4	Oct 25, 2011 by Keystoner
Re: Possible Didymo in the East Branch of the Delaware In by Softhackle	11	Oct 6, 2007 by Martinlf
Re: Time to reboot In General Discussion by Falsifly	4	Nov 30, 2007 by LittleJ
Re: 2nd Annual Fly Swap Patterns In Fly Tying by Martinlf	4	Feb 28, 2009 by JOHNW
Re: rod and reel?? In Gear Talk by Strme007	2	Mar 22, 2009 by Strme007
Re: Long Hiatus In General Discussion by Mike1	1	Dec 4, 2011 by Wbranch
Re: When you can't get to trout, bass will certainly do! In the Photography Board by Jmd123	10	Sep 25, 2010 by Motrout
Re: New Waders In Gear Talk by Bflat	14	Nov 27, 2011 by Sayfu
Re: Simms Guide Waders for Sale In General Discussion by Martinlf	7	May 6, 2008 by Martinlf

Troutnut.com is copyright © 2004-2012 Jason Neuswanger (email Jason). See my FAQ for information about use of my images. privacy policy