Fly Fishing for Trout Home
User Password
or register.
Scientific name search:

> > Pflueger Reels

LastchanceMarch 11th, 2009, 4:50 pm
Portage, PA

Posts: 437
I'm tired of spending a ton of money on fly reels. Anyone care to share their opinions on the Pflueger 1495 RC fly reels. I would use it for 12 to 15 inch trout with the occasional 20-incher. The extra spool is cheap too. With more expensive reels the extra spools cost half as much as the fly reel. I'm not into bashing other models. I just like to know if anyone has regularly used these reels and if they would recommend them.
UPTroutBumMarch 11th, 2009, 5:39 pm
Marquette, MI

Posts: 33
I have one from the 1970's it was my grandfathers. It was the reel I started on. The drag is non existent, tighten it and it doesnt make much difference, but loosen it and line just falls out of the reel. So you get a lot of extra slack around the reel. You can't cant palm the reel either so it really has no drag. Maybe mine is faulty but i don't recommend it. There are many nice reels in the 60-80 dollar range, especially if you dont need great drag.
" The true fisherman approaches the first day of fishing season with
all the sense of wonder and awe of a child approaching Christmas." John Voelker
GreenghostMarch 11th, 2009, 8:35 pm
New Brunswick

Posts: 23
I'd say absolutely,go ahead and buy it,although the 1495 is quite a large reel for that size of fish?I'd think the 1494 with the capability of storing 7wt + backing should be plenty of reel for trout that size.I think maybe one of us is a bit confused though?You indicate the RC designation,which is the 1500 Rim Control series,so I beleive it is the 1595RC that you are considering?Regardless,the 1594RC is likely a better fit than the 95 for your applications.

In regards to experience,I've owned a 1595.5 RC for close to 20 years and have landed a couple hundred Atlantic Salmon and Steelhead up to 20+lbs. with it,as well as a few Chinooks in the 30 lb. range.It's my beleif that expensive fly reels with the latest in drag technology are waaaaay overated and completely unneccesary for most freshwater fishing.I merely set my drag to a comfortable level for stripping line off for casting and tight enough to prevent overrun.With the RC,I can palm the rim if I need to/want to put the brakes on a big fish,but 90%+ of the time I can get adequate drag by merely leaning back into the rod with fish up to 10 lbs. or so?I only recently(last summer)retired my Pfleuger to a back-up reel role and streamer trolling reel after acquiring a Hardy St.John to be used as my main salmon reel.Not that I needed it,but ya gotta love the sound of an Atlantic peeling line from a classic clik&pawl Hardy,LOL.The HSJ has virtually no drag other than as mentioned setting it to prevent overrun,and no exposed rim neither,but I had no trouble landing several salmon with it last season,much the same as anglers have been doing with it for decades.I can think of no legitimate reason for spending several hundred dollars on a trout reel,other than eye appeal and the prestige or status symbol,real or imagined,that goes with having it fastened to a $1000 rod?Pfleuger Medalists have been around and popular for a very long time because they are reliable,inexpensive,and more than enough reel to meet the demands of most anglers.After the fulltime use/abuse mine has taken over the last 20 years,I expect it will easily outlive me in it's now secondary role as a spare/trolling reel.
WbranchMarch 12th, 2009, 1:09 am
York & Starlight PA

Posts: 2733
The Pflueger fly reels are fine reels and more than adequate for the size of fish you are targeting. UPTroutbum's drag must be worn out because normally the drag on the Pflueger reels is stong enough to stop the largest trout.

The fly reels costing over $100 are not going to be any more effective for 12" - 15" trout than one you buy for $50 or less. Trout of that size are unlikely to ever run all the fly line and get into the backing. A simple pawl and click reel is very adequate for those fish. It will also be the lightest reel. I have a bunch of old Hardy Lightweight series reels and the drags are worn on all these reels and yet I have no difficulty landing trout to 22".
Catskill fly fisher for fifty-five years.
PatcrisciMarch 13th, 2009, 5:48 am
Lagrangeville, NY

Posts: 119
In my opinion, any of the Pflueger 1400 series reels are great reels for the price and will serve you well for many years of trout fishing in small to medium sized streams where 9 to 20 inch trout are your quarry. I have a 1492 that I still use. Just be sure to keep it clean and dry and lightly oiled, and check all the screws each spring before you use it or before you put it away for the winter. It may not be a flashy, high tech reel but it will give you many years of reliable service. I recommend Pflueger to anyone who wants an inexpensive, good quality reel.
Pat Crisci
SayfuDecember 5th, 2011, 1:54 pm
Posts: 560
I'd use one for King Salmon, and not consider it inferior, since I use click drag reels. Being able to hold up under freshwater fishing is not a consideration IMO. Weight?..slightly heavy if you want a light reel to match a light rod. I fish my Plueger's a lot. The small screws can be a problem and back out and get lost. I backed mine out, and put LockTight on them. If you want more durability go with the interior spool Pluegers rather than the RC spool Pluegers, as a dropped reel can ding the rim, and bind up the reel. I don't use the rim control feature. If you would palm your reel then the RC reel is a good choice. Just consider which size you want for what you are balancing your rod up for.
PaulRobertsDecember 5th, 2011, 3:44 pm

Posts: 1776
I've had a 1495 for years and it's helped beach a lot of fish, esp lake-runs as that's what I primarily used it for. Perfectly good reel. Not all that pretty by today's standards but it was in it's day I thought -kind of "rugged good looks". I'm happy to see it in my fish pics.
MartinlfDecember 7th, 2011, 4:25 pm
Palmyra PA

Posts: 3233
Take a look at Okuma Sierras for a good basic trout reel if you don't mind an old style small arbor reel. I've used one for years and never had a problem with it.
"He spread them a yard and a half. 'And every one that got away is this big.'"

--Fred Chappell
BigTroutJanuary 31st, 2012, 11:40 pm
Posts: 18
I have a Pflueger 1494 and I love mine, just cleaned it up tonight and everything is in great working condition, I use mine for 12-22 inch trout and it lands them just fine!
The great charm about fly fishing is that we are always learning; no matter how long we have been at it, we are constantly making some new wrinkle. - Theodore Gordon
PaulRobertsFebruary 1st, 2012, 12:37 pm

Posts: 1776
Fancy/new tech reels ARE nice. Can't fault them. And it's "nice" to have good gear. And sometimes/someplaces it actually matters. But there's something satisfying too in rugged simplicity / sufficiency. And I consider my 1495 a perfectly good reel, and am happy to see it in my fish pics. It carries it's own nostalgic romance for me.

I also fish with a 1970's Zebco C4 spinning reel -the green and white one. Remember that one? That was THE spinning reel of it's day and a head turner for those old enough to remember them. And it's actually brand spanking new -just was never used. There are much better reel designs out there now. But it's fun to fish with the old clunker -and it works just fine, provided I pay attention to its quirks (flaws). I even have a 5ft steel bass rod that, when I find an old "Pflooger" casting reel to go with it, I'll take her out and hammer em.

I know romance is a big part of FF, or maybe it just tends to attract romantics. And I'm one too, (although much of the initial swooning period has passed, as I see now it in all it's colors), but sometimes it's fun to toy with those ideas, drop the seriousness, and whomp a bunch of fish with inferior stuff, just bc you can. Kindof like those paintings of the old well-decked FF trying to buy a mess of big trout from a bare-foot kid with a cut sapling for a rod. Hey, my first fish was caught on a sapling my Dad cut for me. Maybe my last one will be too.

One winter some Snoopy bobbers came into the shop and I took one steely fishing. I knew the conditions, knew the water, and Snoopy and I hammered em. Finally a guy approached and asked where he could get a Snoopy float too! He was serious. I told him there were MUCH better floats out there. I have to say, it was great fun watching Snoopy tear off across that raging river. And at one point, Snoopy didn't come back. I did not buy another; just once was enough.

RogueratMarch 1st, 2012, 10:12 am
Posts: 472
I've heard and read mostly good stuff about Pfleuger reels, never tried one though. They're said to be simple and rugged, fresh or salt-water use.
Being a thrifty person, I get my reels 2nd hand, fairly basic features, and stay with major makers such as Scientific Anglers and Cortland. Parts are easier to obtain and the reels rarely go out of style (extinct).

I Peter 5:7 "Cast your cares upon Him...'

Quick Reply

You have to be logged in to post on the forum. It's this easy:
Username:          Email:

Password:    Confirm Password:

I am at least 13 years old and agree to the rules.

Related Discussions

TitleRepliesLast Reply
Michael Hackneys fly reel making class
In General Discussion by Flymom
Re: Can I put an 8wt reel on a 5wt rod?
In Gear Talk by Ogilvy
4Dec 3, 2018
by Serengeti
Re: brand new to fly fishing. reel question
In General Discussion by Lalaleeza
2Oct 20, 2015
by Wbranch
Re: Cheap Reels High Performance???
In Gear Talk by Obtuseangle
24Apr 20, 2008
by Taxon
Re: What kind of replacement fly reel should I get
In Gear Talk by Cptenn94
1Sep 7, 2015
by PaulRoberts
Re: rod and reel??
In Gear Talk by Strme007
2Mar 22, 2009
by Strme007
Re: I lost a MONSTER trout!
In Fishing Reports by Mcflyangler
2Dec 26, 2016
by Falsifly
Re: Opinion Needed!
In Gear Talk by GldstrmSam
9Oct 2, 2013
by Entoman
In Gear Talk by BRY
4Mar 28, 2011
by BRY
Re: MARTIN 61,PFLUEGER 1774 REELS ?? reviews please
In Gear Talk by Ufenando
6Nov 12, 2012
by Brookyman
Most Recent Posts
Re: Rod and reel suggestion?
In Gear Talk by 87North (Erallommakr replied)