Troutnut Forum

>

Photography

> Photo question is subjective

Lastchance	December 27th, 2008, 8:54 am
Portage, PA Posts: 216	For you professionals out there. I'm going out to Montana in August and I'm in need of a digital camera to take on the trip. Is it possible to get some wall-hanging type photo results with a point and shoot camera with a small telephoto lens or do I need to buy a professional model. I realize that's a broad question. How about in the neighborhood of $200. Thanks
UPTroutBum	December 27th, 2008, 11:01 am
Marquette, MI Posts: 33	Im not a professional but yes you can get good quality photos blown up to atleast 12" probably more.
	" The true fisherman approaches the first day of fishing season with all the sense of wonder and awe of a child approaching Christmas." John Voelker
JAD	December 27th, 2008, 11:02 am
Alexandria Pa Posts: 362	Hi Bruce I just bought this one--Olympus Stylus 1030 SW Here is a Review--http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=3444. I'm no profession but the 1030 takes good pictures and is the next thing to imposable to damage. It also takes under water movies and pics. JAD
	They fasten red (crimson red) wool around a hook, and fix onto the wool two feathers which grow under a cock’s wattles, and which in colour are like wax. Radcliffe's Fishing from the Earliest Times,
Troutnut	December 27th, 2008, 1:17 pm
The Admin Fairbanks, AK Posts: 2020	Yeah, you certainly can. It depends how big you want the photo on our you wall to be. Just about any consumer camera can do nice 8x10s. A really nice 20x30 is going to take a pretty expensive camera, but I'm guessing that's not what you're looking for. If you are just looking for 8x10s, don't get too caught up in the camera's "megapixels," because most of them will be good enough for that right now. Look at reviews on sites like dpreview.com and see how the cameras are reviewed for sharpness, noise, and color. Megapixels are still the most common selling point used by salesmen, but enough is enough -- those other aspects are where you'll find the real differences for most cameras. Another common, misleading selling point is the zoom, because people like the idea of getting good pictures of stuff that's far away. Consumer cameras just can't do that very well, though, even if they're marked as "12x zoom": they'll get you zoomed in, but the pictures will disappoint. For zoom, 3x or 4x is enough. Anything more than that and you're bound to get a lot of blurry pictures. Long-zoom photos from point+shoot cameras just don't work well unless conditions are ideal (steady hand, good lighting, etc). Your best wall-hangers are almost certain to come from the low end of the zoom range.
	Jason Neuswanger The Troutnut
Lastchance	December 28th, 2008, 8:18 am
Portage, PA Posts: 216	Thanks All! I'm looking for some nice scenery photos in the 8 x 10 to 11 x 14 inch range. I have a film camera,, and old Cannon AE-1, but I'm wondering if it's going to be too much to carry with 3 lenses while I'm wading, etc. Good point about the megapixels and zoom, too.
Hellgramite	January 21st, 2009, 8:30 pm
Southern calif. Posts: 45	Hay Lastchance:I may be to late but as far as a camera goes you want the most Mega Pixel you can afford.To blow up to 8X10 or larger you want 6 or higher.Also get a camera with the best quality lens because the lens is the heart of the camera.Make sure the camera uses AA batteries so you can get a set that you can recharge.Plus if your batteries run down you can keep a couple in your pocket.Allot of cameras come with expensive batteries and the only way to recharge is to plug in the camera.And they cost 30-40 Dollars to replace.Get a memory card that can hold a couple hundred pictures so you can just shoot away.I hope this well help..Have a great trip and cant wait to here about the great time you well have.Rick
Dr_BlueDun	February 2nd, 2009, 12:34 pm
Long Island NY Posts: 10	That danged 1030SW from Olympus debuted around 2 weeks after I bought my Canon SD 1100S. I would have appreciated the waterproofness of the Olympus. The 10mgp is an outstanding amount of clarity and you should be able to get to 18" blow-ups with no picture "noise,"if you can keep the ISO below 200. I have however purchased a waterproof case for the Canon and it should be able to compete with the Olympus 1030SW. BTW the Amazon.com price is outstanding.
	"Doc"

Quick Reply

Related Discussions

Title	Replies	Last Reply
First Underwater camera In the Photography Board by Fishgator	0
Re: What's the best lighting source? In the Photography Board by Psyfly	3	Oct 14, 2007 by Softhackle
Re: Down to 2 cameras choices In the Photography Board by Lastchance	6	Jun 29, 2009 by Roygpa
Re: Does anyone have success fishing this hatch? In the Caddisfly Genus Mystacides by Troutnut	9	Jan 14, 2011 by PaulRoberts
Re: Hi All, new to the forum In the Photography Board by Kroil	7	Mar 13, 2008 by Wbranch
Re: My first aquatic insect photos; open for identification In the Photography Board by Bcvizina	4	Mar 16, 2010 by Wiflyfisher
Re: Advise on best compact P & S camera for macro field use? In the Photography Board by Entoman	13	Feb 15, 2011 by Entoman
Re: Camera protection In the Photography Board by Delablobbo	1	Mar 20, 2010 by Wiflyfisher
Re: Fall colors In General Discussion by Troutnut	1	Oct 19, 2006 by Shawnny3
Re: Underwater Camera Comparison In the Photography Board by Troutnut	1	Apr 7, 2007 by JAD

Troutnut.com is copyright © 2004-2012 Jason Neuswanger (email Jason). See my FAQ for information about use of my images. privacy policy