Troutnut.com Fly Fishing for Trout Home
User Password
or register.

Troutnut Forum > Specimen Discussion > ID

The Specimen

Acerpenna pygmaea (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly DunAcerpenna pygmaea (Blue-Winged Olive) Mayfly DunView 4 PicturesI'm guessing this specimen is in the genus Acerpenna because of the very sharp costal process (
The costal process of a Baetidae dun.
The costal process of a Baetidae dun.
Costal process: A bump or point sticking up from the front margin of an insect's wing, usually the rear wing of certain mayflies. It is sometimes called a costal projection.
)
on her hind wing. I'm guessing pygmaea because it is the most common species.
Region: Upper Midwest
Collected Jul 1, 2005
Added Apr 22, 2006

The Discussion

TaxonJuly 2nd, 2006, 1:54 am
Mercer Island, WA

Posts: 485
Jason-

My guess would be Baetis brunneicolor.

Roger
Roger Rohrbeck
www.FlyfishingEntomology.com
These advertisements will disappear if you register.
Replies:
TroutnutJuly 2nd, 2006, 10:20 am
Fairbanks, AK

Posts: 1115
How come?
Jason Neuswanger
The Troutnut
TaxonJuly 6th, 2006, 1:45 pm
Mercer Island, WA

Posts: 485
Jason-

Oh, sorry. Just discovered your response. Because of the striking similarity of your specimen's fore wing venation to the that of Baetis brunneicolor portrayed in Leonard & Leonard, page 87, Fig. 51.

Here is your photo arranged for comparison purposes:


Roger Rohrbeck
www.FlyfishingEntomology.com
TroutnutJuly 6th, 2006, 2:25 pm
Fairbanks, AK

Posts: 1115
Ok, thanks. I just looked at Leonard and you're right that the venation is strikingly similar (though not identical). They don't have very many other Baetis wings to compare to, though, so I'm hesitant to rule out the other species on those grounds.

The costal process on the hind wing is much sharper in this specimen than in the Leondards' drawing. I think that's a fairly important characteristic for this family and it's one reason I'm hesitant to call it Baetis.

Also, the Leonards show some intercalary veins on the hind wings of brunneicolor, which I don't see in this photo. That could be due to individual variation or bad focus in the photo, though.

The taxonomy of this whole family is such a mess right now. I really hope somebody publishes a definitive key to the genera soon based on something better than mandible setae and the like.
Jason Neuswanger
The Troutnut
TroutnutSeptember 22nd, 2006, 12:28 am
Fairbanks, AK

Posts: 1115
I'm even more confident that this is Acerpenna now that I've photographed an extremely similar specimen from upstate NY. The new female was associated with a male which I also photographed, and it keyed fairly confidently to Acerpenna in Merritt & Cummins.

I've fallen a bit behind on posting new pictures I've taken. I've got about 30 new specimens to put up, I think, including the Acerpenna pair. All that's coming ASAP.
Jason Neuswanger
The Troutnut
Most Recent Posts
Re: Help unsticking my fly rod
In General Discussion by Freepow
Re: Fly rods
In General Discussion by Martinlf
Re: Yearly Hatches
In General Discussion by Vermonter
Re: Night-fishing for trout
In General Discussion by Vermonter
Re: You Guys Hate Me Yet :) More pics
In the Identify This! Board by Taxon
Re: Leaders?
In General Discussion by Troutster
Re: Out from Montana, Neversink???
In General Discussion by Martinlf
Middle Lehigh River 5-15-2008
In Fishing Reports by JOHNW
Re: key of mayllies larvae
In the Mayfly Genus Ephemerella by Konchu
Re: WI contingent
In General Discussion by Freepow
Re: Wisconsin trout pics
In the Photography Board by Smallstream
Re: Aqua Glo glow in the dark dressing for flies
In General Discussion by Vermonter
Re: Added more Heptagenia culacantha info
In the Mayfly Species Heptagenia culacantha by Taxon
Wild Browns
In the Photography Board by BGrnFlyfish
Re: Battenkill Bugs
In the Identify This! Board by DayTripper